Mark Byrnes's Facing Backwards

"A historian is often only a journalist facing backwards." -- Karl Kraus

Mark Byrnes is an associate professor of history at Wofford College in Spartanburg, SC.

• 
  Feb 1, 2015 10:03 pm
  

  "There Was a Right Side and a Wrong Side": Art and Historical Memory

  by Mark Byrnes

  Why The Civil War: The Musical is both top notch -- with a great set and costumes -- and also deeply flawed.
  

• 
  Dec 14, 2014 11:46 pm
  

  Dick Cheney’s David Frost Moment

  by Mark Byrnes

  “I'm more concerned with bad guys who got out and released than I am with a few that, in fact, were innocent.”--Dick Cheney on Meet the Press
  

• 
  Oct 20, 2014 1:23 am
  

  Can Obama Do in Iraq What Nixon and Ford Couldn't in Vietnam?

  by Mark Byrnes

  Whether Obama will be able to keep his promise not to send American ground forces back to Iraq is very much an open question. 
  

• 
  Sep 29, 2014 1:57 am
  

  Obama's Playing “Small Ball” in Iraq and Syria

  by Mark Byrnes

  Small ball may be the right approach in this case, but it would have been better if the president had not appeared to be calling his shot and pointing to the stands.
  

• 
  Sep 8, 2014 2:14 am
  

  What Obama's Critics Are Forgetting: Policy-Making Always Looks Decisive--In Retrospect

  by Mark Byrnes

  In memory, we see decision rather than deliberation. The danger is that it then becomes easy to forget the deliberation ever happened.
  

• 
  Aug 19, 2014 8:06 pm
  

  "He Wasn't A Regular Guy"

  by Mark Byrnes

  The eagerness on the part of some people to embrace a narrative that suggests that Michael Brown "deserved it," before the facts are established, has a long and ugly history--and that fact may be far more significant and troubling than what happened that day in Ferguson.
  

• 
  Aug 1, 2014 9:00 pm
  

  The Lesson Tolstoy Teaches About Writing History that We Should Remember on the Anniversary of World War I

  by Mark Byrnes

  An age-old debate in history is whether individuals make history, or whether individuals are swept along by great forces that they can only hope to ride skillfully, not control completely.

  Tolstoy gave expression to the latter idea in War and Peace:

  The further back we transport ourselves in examining events, the less arbitrary they appear to us…. The further back in history we transport the object of our observation, the more questionable becomes the freedom of the men producing events, and the more obvious the law of necessity. 

  While the wide, long-term perspective employed by Tolstoy in this passage is familiar to historians, two articles in the popular press prompted by the anniversary of the beginning of World War I show the great appeal of focusing on the individual. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan details the toll taken by the war on the leaders of major states: Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm II, England’s King George V, Russia’s Czar Nicholas II. In the Washington Post, Graham Allison examines how two of those three leaders (“Nicky and Willy”) tried to prevent the war. 

  

• 
  Jul 22, 2014 5:47 pm
  

  Historical Humility

  by Mark Byrnes

  The great advantage historians have is that we know how the story ends. 

  The great temptation that follows from that fact is historical arrogance—an unspoken certainty that because we know it now, we would have known it then. 

  The great challenge, therefore, is to impose upon ourselves historical humility, to remind ourselves that the historical actors we study did not have the advantage we do of knowing the story’s end. 

  I was reminded of that recently while doing some research at the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library in Hyde Park, NY. I’m working on the role of radio in the Great Debate over American intervention in World War II, and came across some of the countless personal letters people wrote to FDR on the subject.