100 Days is a Ridiculous Way to Judge a Presidency

tags: presidential history, Joe Biden

Lindsay M. Chervinsky, Ph.D. is a presidential historian and scholar in residence at the Institute for Thomas Paine Studies at Iona College. She is also the author of The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution and can be followed on Twitter @lmchervinsky.

In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt took office during an unprecedented economic crisis. Nearly 25 percent of Americans were unemployed, banks were failing, crop prices were falling — and these conditions had accelerated for years, leading to widespread hunger. In his first 100 days in office, FDR worked with Congress to pass fifteen critical bills that created relief measures like the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Public Works Administration, and implemented economic reforms to rescue farmers and banks. FDR’s extraordinary accomplishments in his first term set a standard against which few presidents can match up — regardless of whether that comparison makes sense or not. And that standard makes zero sense in 2021.

Until FDR, no president was expected to change the world in 100 days. When George Washington took the oath of office on April 30, 1789, the First Federal Congress hadn’t even created the executive departments yet. Rather than announcing his platform in his first inaugural address, Washington asked Congress to “acquit” him of the responsibility to recommend necessary and expedient measures until he had a better lay of the land. Furthermore, Thomas Jefferson didn’t take office as secretary of state until March 22, 1790, nearly a year into Washington’s term — so clearly there was no widespread expectation about what the first president would accomplish in the first 100 days.

Americans were also willing to extend more patience to Abraham Lincoln. Both Northerners and Southerners were naively convinced they would win the Civil War quickly, and the Union expected Lincoln to lead the war effort. But even though the war was still ongoing several years later, voters in the Union reelected Lincoln by a ten-point margin and overwhelming electoral college victory in 1864. 

If anything, 1933 was a historical aberration. For example, on March 4, the Senate unanimously confirmed FDR’s entire Cabinet without hearings on the day of his inauguration. After taking the oath of office, the president returned to the White House, greeted a few guests at the afternoon tea, then got to work. Upstairs in the second-floor oval drawing room, Justice Benjamin Cardozo was waiting to swear in the entire Cabinet as a group — for the first and only time in U.S. history. Recognizing the enormous challenge facing the nation, the Senate had moved quickly to provide FDR with his chosen Cabinet, so that the administration could get to work on day one. In FDR’s entire 12 years in office, Republicans cast only 83 “no” votes scattered across 25 Cabinet nominees.  

Since FDR, few presidents have taken office with the crisis conditions that compels an administration and Congress to take such drastic action. However, on January 20, 2021, President Biden took office amid his own economic crisis, a global pandemic, ongoing climate change and oppressive systemic racism. Yet, the partisan divide in Congress prevented Biden from meeting with his complete Cabinet until April 1. Additionally, Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland was confirmed with only 51 “yes” votes, Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra received just 50 “yes” votes and Biden’s withdrew Neera Tanden as his nominee for director of the Office of Management and Budget after the Senate indicated that it would reject her nomination. A far cry from the rapid, unanimous confirmations for FDR’s Cabinet. 


Read entire article at The Hill

comments powered by Disqus