Voter suppression carries slavery's three-fifths clause into the presentRoundup
tags: Constitution, James Madison, voting rights, Voter Suppression
Imani Perry is the Hughes-Rogers professor of African American Studies at Princeton University. She is the author of five books, including Looking for Lorraine: The Radiant and Radical Life of Lorraine Hansberry.
Two decades ago, while a law student, I took a class titled The Federalist Papers. Our small group sat in a small seminar room off of the library, a collection of nerds – most, I gathered, aspiring to be judges or academics rather than following the tide of corporate practice. I was one of two women, and the only Black student in the room: an experience of oddity I had grown used to.
As I recall, we spent the most time poring over Federalist 51, the paper that outlines the fundamentals of what we now term Madisonian democracy. But the part I personally sat with, long after the class was over, was Federalist 54, mostly likely also authored by Madison. Like many African Americans, I had come of age hearing about how the three-fifths clause – which proposed that three out of every five slaves be counted to determine a state’s population – was a mark of how we Black people were not deemed fully human when the constitution was first ratified. Here, fully elaborated, was an earnest, though tortured, justification for the enshrinement of indecency. That classic essay remains key to understanding race in the United States.
And so my interest in Madison’s Federalist 54 has been sustained. Admittedly, for personal reasons, in part: I am the descendent of Black people who were enslaved in a county named after James Madison: Madison, Alabama. I am a professor of Black studies where Madison once was a student and made my way from teaching constitutional law about a decade ago. I also see the insidious remnants of Federalist 54 in the current landscape, specifically in the issue of voter suppression.
comments powered by Disqus
- Historian Tom Engelhardt Revisits His First Piece of Critical History – 48 Years Later
- Heather Cox Richardson: Trump isn’t the first president to compare himself to Jesus — the last one who did ‘planned to lead his white supremacist supporters to victory’
- Historians' archival research looks quite different in the digital age
- Senate Historian Daniel S. Holt Featured on Political Theatre Podcast
- The Way We Do the Things We Do: Making History-Making Visible