Constitution 
-
SOURCE: New York Times
5/2/2023
How to Get Americans To Embrace Constitutional Amendments Again
by Kate Shaw and Julie K. Suk
As recent Supreme Court decisions on guns and abortion rights have made many Americans fear the loss of basic rights, reviving the effort to pass the Equal Rights Amendment can remind Americans that nine people in robes don't have to be the final authority on the Constitution.
-
4/9/2023
Why Did Madison Write the Second Amendment?
by Carl T. Bogus
Understanding the political peril that ensnared both the pre-ratification Constitution and James Madison himself makes it clear that the Second Amendment was written to ensure that southern state militias would be sufficiently armed to suppress slave revolts even if abolitionists controlled Washington.
-
3/26/2023
The History of State Interposition Shows Federalism is a Deliberative Process, not a Set of Rules
by Christian G. Fritz
The efforts of state legislatures to oppose federal law have been varied. In sum, they show that the Supreme Court cannot dictate the distribution of power under federalism; Americans will have to keep figuring it out as we go, through political deliberation.
-
SOURCE: New York Times
3/14/2023
SCOTUS Decision Means Today's Gun Cases Require Experts on 1790s Weaponry
Legal historians Saul Cornell, Jennifer Tucker and others are in high demand as a legal consultant after the Bruen decision elevated the historical meaning of gun laws to importance in the judicial process.
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
2/22/2023
Ron DeSantis is Making History a Political Issue; What does His Book Say?
by David Waldstreicher
Nobody paid much attention to the Florida governor's 2011 book "Dreams from Our Founding Fathers." Maybe we should now—it spells out a justification for a deeply conservative view of the constitution that dismisses the significance of racism in the founding and in the doctrine of originalism.
-
SOURCE: MSNBC
1/15/2023
Nobody Likes the Electoral College—What are the Alternatives?
Constitutional Scholar Akhil Reed Amar discusses how to replace the current electoral system with something more democratic and participatory.
-
SOURCE: Washington Post
1/3/2022
The Constitution Won't Be Much Help Resolving the Speaker Mess
While the Constitution requires the House to choose it's speaker, it gives no guidance how. Usually custom and party discipline are sufficient to accomplish the task, but not always.
-
SOURCE: Mother Jones
12/6/2022
SCOTUS Seems Poised to Overrule Democracy By Drawing on a Historical Forgery
In 1818, Charles Pinckney of South Carolina sent John Quincy Adams a fake document that made it look like Pinckney was a principal author of the 1787 Constitution. At the time, the ruse was rejected. Why are Supreme Court conservatives looking to this document in to justify their decisions?
-
10/9/2022
Lincoln Would have Had an Answer for the "Originalists"
by Richard Striner
The 16th President looked to the constitutional crises of his time and asked whether the document was created to serve the people or the other way around. Today he might ask the same of the Supreme Court.
-
SOURCE: NPR
9/25/2022
The Constitution's Support for Oligarchy
Jonathan Gienapp says that the Framers made deliberate choices to make the Constitution a bulwark against what they saw as the danger of broad-based democracy.
-
9/25/2022
Thinking and Teaching the Implications of Federalist #10 for Democracy
by Jeff Schneider
Teachers of Constitutional history must push their students to understand something difficult: James Madison's vision of the "public good" is a vision of elite rule that today stands in the way of democratic solutions to society's problems.
-
9/18/2022
How the Constitution Can Accommodate Divergent Values
by James D.R. Philips
When founding the nation, American political leaders had to both leverage Americans’ shared political culture and beliefs, and allow for Americans’ differing moral beliefs and values.
-
SOURCE: Politico
9/15/2022
"Independent State Legislature" Legal Theory Based in Fake History
Charles Pinckney's ideas for the Constitution were rejected by the framers. Years later, he produced fake documents to aggrandize his own role at the convention. Right-wing legal activists have used them to argue that state legislatures can decide election results however they want.
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
8/28/2022
The Amendment Process is the Constitution's Biggest Flaw
by Jedediah Britton-Purdy
We are not the "we, the people" of 1789. Changing Article V to make the Constitution more easily amendable is the key to breaking the shackles the document places on democracy.
-
SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
8/2/2022
SCOTUS Hasn't Always Been the Final Arbiter; Liberals Should Stop Thinking it Is
by Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath
"Liberals drew the wrong lessons from the mid-20th century federal judiciary’s fleeting embrace of social reform, and forgot that over the long arc of U.S. history, the minority rights the court has most consistently safeguarded have been those of the wealthy and powerful, the corporate, landed and enslaver elites."
-
7/31/2022
Time to Amend the Constitution
by Don Fraser
Significant changes are needed to the Constitution in order to preserve any semblance of democratic government.
-
7/8/2022
The Second Floundering
by Brook Thomas
Although scholars have identified the Reconstruction Amendments as a redemption of the flaws of the original Constitution, it's important to understand, as critics did at the time, that the 14th and 15th Amendments left many gaps in the American democracy.
-
SOURCE: Boston Review
5/23/2022
Make Progressive Politics Constitutional Again
by Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath
It is time to jettison the legal liberalism that holds constitutional interpretation separate from popular politics, or else the government's ability to legislate in the public interest will be destroyed.
-
SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
5/3/2022
The Reconstruction Amendments and the Basis of American Abortion Rights
by Peggy Cooper Davis
When the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were debated, concerns about the protection of both public rights of citizenship and private, intimate rights of individuals were front and center. There is, notwithstanding Samuel Alito's opinion, a long tradition of constitutional respect for privacy.
-
SOURCE: Washington Post
3/13/2022
What if the Constitution is the Source of Democratic Erosion?
by Noah Feldman
James Madison feared from the beginning that the design of the US Senate was contrary to the core principles of a democratic republic. A Harvard Law professor says that if the nation can survive with a fundamentally undemocratic institution at the heart of the government, partisan gerrymandering might not be too bad.
News
- The Debt Ceiling Law is now a Tool of Partisan Political Power; Abolish It
- Amitai Etzioni, Theorist of Communitarianism, Dies at 94
- Kagan, Sotomayor Join SCOTUS Cons in Sticking it to Unions
- New Evidence: Rehnquist Pretty Much OK with Plessy v. Ferguson
- Ohio Unions Link Academic Freedom and the Freedom to Strike
- First Round of Obama Administration Oral Histories Focus on Political Fault Lines and Policy Tradeoffs
- The Tulsa Race Massacre was an Attack on Black People; Rebuilding Policies were an Attack on Black Wealth
- British Universities are Researching Ties to Slavery. Conservative Alumni Say "Enough"
- Martha Hodes Reconstructs Her Memory of a 1970 Hijacking
- Jeremi Suri: Texas Higher Ed Conflict "Doesn't Have to Be This Way"
Trending Now
- New transcript of Ayn Rand at West Point in 1974 shows she claimed “savage" Indians had no right to live here just because they were born here
- The Mexican War Suggests Ukraine May End Up Conceding Crimea. World War I Suggests the Price May Be Tragic if it Doesn't
- The Vietnam War Crimes You Never Heard Of