Historians clash over open access movementHistorians in the News
tags: American Historical Association, open access
WASHINGTON -- If the open access movement can’t replace the traditional publishing model of scholarly journals, what problem is the effort trying to solve?
Participants during a session titled “Open Access and Publishing in History and the Social Sciences: Opportunities and Challenges” at the American Historical Association’s annual meeting clashed over that question Friday afternoon as they debated the role of open access journals in promoting scholarly research.
Journal subscriptions have traditionally funded the dissemination of
research, but supporters of the open-access movement have experimented
with shifting the costs elsewhere. One model, gold open access, requires
articles to be made available free online when they are published in
print, and the author pays a processing fee -- often about $2,000 -- to
offset the costs. Another model, green open access, makes a rough copy
of a published article available through a public repository. Some
universities have also adopted policies that require faculty members to
make their published research publicly available....
comments powered by Disqus
- The New York Times journalist who secretly led the charge against liberal media bias
- A history lesson: Do tax cuts pay for themselves?
- Trump is being sued to stop him from shrinking Bears Ears national monument by 85 percent. Who will win?
- As colleges investigate slavery ties, George Washington University joins in
- Before the Bus, Rosa Parks Was a Sexual Assault Investigator
- The Penn TA who said she calls on black women first won’t be teaching next semester
- Black South African scholars urged to correct white historians’ distortion
- At Columbia, Three Women, 30 Years and a Pattern of Harassment
- Pakistani Historian Mobarak Haidar says Muslims “have no religious basis to rule Jerusalem”
- AHA Announces Last-Minute Sessions Timed to News Events