With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Dutch Publisher Stops Printing Book Alleging Fellow Jew Betrayed Anne Frank's Family

Ambo Anthos, the Amsterdam-based publishing house that printed the Dutch-language translation of a controversial book alleging that a Jew had betrayed Anne Frank, has apologized for not reviewing the material more critically and ceased printing new copies of it on Monday.

The book “The Betrayal of Anne Frank,” published earlier this month by the Canadian author Rosemary Sullivan, hypothesizes that the teenage diarist and her family were turned over to the Nazis by Arnold van den Bergh, a notary and a member of the Jewish Council, which the Nazis established to better control Dutch Jews.

The book documents the work of a cold case investigation team set up six years ago. But soon after it was published, several critics, including well-known historians who specialize in the history of the Frank family, dismissed the probe’s conclusion as inconclusive and irresponsible.

Bart van der Boom, a Leiden University historian who has written extensively about the Jewish Council, called the findings “libelous nonsense.” David Barnouw, one of the best-respected historians of World War II in the Netherlands, said he had considered van den Bergh but dismissed him as a suspect and called the book’s allegation “lacking in evidence.”

The main piece of evidence in the investigation is an anonymous letter naming van den Bergh sent to Otto Frank, Anne’s father and the only member of the nuclear family of four who survived the Holocaust.

NOS reported that some experts do not believe van den Bergh had access to a list of addresses of Jews in hiding at the time.

Read entire article at Forward