Even After Their Fearmongering Proves Wrong, Republicans Keep At It. Here’s Why.Roundup
tags: crime, Donald Trump, Law and Order
Lawrence B. Glickman is Stephen and Evalyn Milman professor in American Studies in the department of history at Cornell University. He is author of Buying Power: A History of Consumer Activism in America and, most recently, Free Enterprise: An American History.
At last week’s Republican National Convention, presidential son Eric Trump evoked Ronald Reagan when he warned about the imminent threats to freedom that a Biden administration would pose. Accusing the “radical Democrats” of wanting to burn the flag, defund the police and “erase history,” among other depredations, he depicted “the fight that we are in right now” as urgent and necessary for the preservation of liberty.
His remarks were similar to those of Sarah Palin, who referenced Reagan’s comments in her 2008 vice-presidential debate with Joe Biden and later included them in her 2010 book, “America By Heart,” as a sentiment that “perfectly expresses our need to protect and preserve American values.”
Although it’s not surprising to find Republicans quoting Reagan, there is a catch: This line from the Gipper came from a badly flawed 1961 prediction about Medicare. Reagan claimed — modifying a line that he had been regularly using in the previous months to dramatically conclude his speeches — that in the “sunset years” of his generation “our children and our children’s children” would not know “what it was like to be free” if Medicare, which Reagan denounced as “socialized medicine,” became the law of the land. Yet, today, more than 55 years after its enactment, Medicare ranks after Social Security as the second-most popular government program, and Americans remain free.
The continued use of an embarrassingly misguided warning shows how conservatives have gravitated toward recycled apocalyptic rhetoric, notwithstanding the fact that their dire predictions have never come to pass. Crying wolf like this long predates Reagan’s 1961 comment. It dates to the early days of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, when Roosevelt’s opponents framed their criticisms not as a dispute about policy, but as an existential fight to preserve liberty.
When critics equated New Deal liberalism with socialism, they did so to mark the latter as the inevitable fate of the former. In the words of presidential son and future senator Robert Taft in 1936, the New Deal would “lead inexorably to complete socialism.” Predictions of imminent doom if the Social Security Act became law proved inaccurate, but that didn’t stop anti-New Deal Rep. Samuel Pettengill from predicting in 1936 (which Reagan echoed a generation later) that “this may well be the last generation of Americans to receive and cherish the legacy of liberty.”
comments powered by Disqus
- Merrittocracy with Keri Leigh Merritt: Kevin Kruse on the 2020 Election
- Radical Protests Propelled the Suffrage Movement. Here’s How a New Museum Captures That History
- Not Every U.S. Presidential Race Has Been Decided on Election Day. Here’s What to Know About America’s History of Contested Elections
- Control, Alter, Delete:Hong Kong Activists and Academics are Hurrying to Digitize Historical Records
- Voter Fraud, Suppression and Partisanship: A Look at the 1876 Election