Are school vouchers bad because early proponents had racist motivations?Roundup
tags: racism, education, school vouchers
Margaret Sanger and other early supporters of birth control were racists, who feared that non-whites would overcome America if their numbers were not limited. So, as conservative media often claim, anyone who campaigns for expanded birth control services today is also a racist. Right?
Wrong. Call it the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree fallacy: If something had evil roots, it remains evil. The fallacy is deeply bipartisan, infecting liberals and conservatives alike. And it’s poison to honest political dialogue, which should acknowledge history without blithely assuming that we’re prisoners of it.
Our latest example comes courtesy of American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten, who told 1,400 teachers at the AFT’s summer conference on Thursday that school-voucher proposals are “only slightly more polite cousins of segregation.”
As Weingarten pointed out, early advocates of public dollars for private schools tried to use such plans to resist court-ordered desegregation. In Prince Edward County, Virginia, most notoriously, white officials closed the entire public school system and then created whites-only private academies, paid for with public funds.
She’s right about the history, just as birth-control critics are correct about Margaret Sanger. But it hardly follows that Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and other school-voucher proponents today are racist, any more than Planned Parenthood is. ...
comments powered by Disqus
- What Does Invoking The 25th Amendment Actually Look Like?
- Paul Allen’s team finds wreck of storied USS Helena, torpedoed in 1943
- Israel Celebrates Its 70th Israeli Style: With Rancor and Bickering
- ‘One last time’: Barbara Bush had already faced a death more painful than her own
- Belgium comes to terms with 'human zoos' of its colonial past
- Mary Beard cut from US version of “Civilisations"
- Timothy Garton Ash: "We have six months to foil Brexit. And here’s how we can do it.”
- Why the Pulitzer Prize committee keeps ignoring women’s history
- No, we're not reliving the 1960s, says Harvard historian Arne Westad
- 2018 Pulitzers in History, Biography and Nonfiction Go to ...