New York Times

• 
• SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
  7/15/2021
  

  A Major Supreme Court First Amendment Decision Could Be At Risk

  by Samantha Barbas

  The "actual malice" standard of proof in libel suits established by New York Times v. Sullivan is an imperfect fit for the social media age, but right-wing calls to overturn the ruling would allow the rich and powerful to bully the press with expensive lawsuits. 

• 
• SOURCE: Reason
  4/27/2021
  

  Elegy for Op-Ed

  by Michael J. Socolow

  The decision by the Times to rebrand its outside commentaries reflects its failure to fight consistently over the years for the open exchange of ideas and to differentiate the views it published from its own official positions. 

• 
• 1/31/2021
  

  Palin v. New York Times is a Textualist Land Mine for the First Amendment

  by Richard E. Labunski

  In June, trial will begin in Sarah Palin's libel case against the New York Times. The case appears to be teed up on a path to the Supreme Court, where the current "actual malice" standard for proving a public figure was libeled could be overturned. If this happens, the door will be open to lawsuits aimed at crushing press criticism of the government.

• 
• SOURCE: The Way of Improvement Leads Home
  3/11/2020
  

  The New York Times Backs-Off a Controversial Claim in its 1619 Project

  by John Fea

  The New York Times Magazine offers some nuance. It appears that a recent panel featuring Alan Taylor, Annette Gordon-Reed, and others had something to do with this.

• 
• SOURCE: New York Post
  3/3/2020
  

  The 1619 Project’s outrageous, lying slander of Abe Lincoln

  by Allen C. Guelzo

  Humanities scholar Allen C. Guelzo defends Lincoln in the face of The 1619 Project's scrutiny.

• 
• SOURCE: The Chronicle of Higher Education
  3/5/2020
  

  What the 1619 Project Really Means

  by Timothy Messer-Kruse

  Professor Timothy Messer-Kruse argues that critics from both ends of the political spectrum have misunderstood the project.

• 
• SOURCE: NY Times
  2/6/20
  

  New York Times Publishes Sweeping Collection: "Reflections on 1960, the Year of Africa"

  The feature includes images from all of the 17 African countries that gained independence in 1960 and reflections of creative people of African descent to give their personal reactions to these images. 

• 
• SOURCE: American Historical Review
  1/23/20
  

  1619 and All That

  by Alex Lichtenstein

  "What is odd about the letter is that it implies that the singular problem with the 1619 Project is that journalists are practicing history without a license."

• 
• 1/26/20
  

  1,056 Feet: Why I Needed the 1619 Project Growing Up

  by Derek Litvak

  The 1619 Project is not interested in retelling America’s founding story. It seeks to forge a new one. The people who contributed to this effort know full well those like myself, who grew up in the drainage ditches of America, in the long shadow of a bright star, need to hear this history. Demands to “stick to the facts” often sideline or silence our story. 

• 
• 1/26/20
  

  Twelve Scholars Critique the 1619 Project and the New York Times Magazine Editor Responds

  Scholars composed a letter to The New Times Magazine concerning 'The 1619 Project.' The NYTM editor, Jake Silverstein, responded but the NYTM declined to publish the letter and his response. The scholars created a reply and Silverstein had no objection to publishing the exchange in another venue. It is published here.

• 
• SOURCE: The Atlantic
  1/22/20
  

  A Matter of Facts

  by Sean Wilentz

  The New York Times’ 1619 Project launched with the best of intentions, but has been undermined by some of its claims.

• 
• SOURCE: The Atlantic
  12/23/19
  

  The Fight Over the 1619 Project Is Not About the Facts

  by Adam Serwer

  A dispute between a small group of scholars and the authors of The New York Times Magazine’s issue on slavery represents a fundamental disagreement over the trajectory of American society.

• 
• SOURCE: Washington Post
  12/22/19
  

  Five professors say the 1619 Project should be amended. ‘We disagree,’ says the New York Times.

  In a lengthy response published online over the weekend, New York Times Magazine editor Jake Silverstein addressed each concern from the professors but stood firmly behind the reporting and declined to correct it.

• 
• SOURCE: NY Times
  8/13/19
  

  Help the New York Times Create a Walking Map of Women's History

  Researchers estimate that women’s stories make up just 0.5 percent of recorded history. 

• 
• 4/7/19
  

  James Madison Responds to Sean Wilentz

  by Alan Singer

  The Electoral College may not have been expressly designed only to protect African slavery, but based on Madison’s notes, it was the mode most preferred by pro-slavery forces.

• 
• 1/14/18
  

  God Awful Questions for Christianity that Are Apparently Unfit to Be Addressed in the New York Times

  by Philip Nobile

  Why?

• 
• 8-15-15
  

  What It Was Like to Write for the New York Times Series on the Civil War

  by Terry L. Jones

  “What made a strong impression on me was the loathing many commenters had for the South and political conservatives. This truly shocked me.”

• 
• 2-25-15
  

  John Lewis Gaddis and other Cold War historians are back in demand

  by HNN Staff

  Russianists are once again the talk of the town.

• 
• SOURCE: New York Times
  1-6-14
  

  New York Times Room for Debate: Turning Away From Painful Chapters

  What happens when we ignore ugly truths about the past -- when families bury their dark secrets, and nations try to forget their sins?

• 
• 10-28-13
  

  The New York Times recycles John Ford Pearl Harbor footage

  by David Austin Walsh

  Historian Andrew J. Bacevich calls out the Times for using "faked" footage.