What Harry Truman Could Teach George W. Bush About Being an “Ex”
But if these outings were intended to project an image of folksy ordinariness, they fell flat. The former president still travels in a motorcade and is surrounded by Secret Service agents. Not exactly how Joe Sixpack runs around town.
If Bush really wants to come across as a regular guy, he should follow the example of Harry Truman, the last president to resume something resembling a normal life after leaving office. Doing so might also improve Bush’s dismal public standing. When Truman left the White House he was as unpopular as Bush is today. But within 20 years, Truman had managed to become a beloved figure. In 1969 he ranked seventh in the Gallup Poll’s annual list of America’s “Most Admired Men.”
How to achieve such a turnaround?
1. Ditch the limo. As soon as Truman returned home to Independence, Missouri, he bought a shiny new Chrysler – and drove himself everywhere. In the summer of 1953 he even drove to the East Coast and back again – a trip of 2,500 miles! Considering the state of the American automobile industry, Bush would score a lot of points if he bought a new Chrysler (or Ford or GM) and drove it himself.
2. Lose the Secret Service. Ex-presidents weren’t entitled to Secret Service protection when Truman left office. Though he was sometimes accompanied by an Independence cop, Truman often traveled alone, removing a major barrier between him and the public. By law, George W. Bush is only entitled to Secret Service protection until 2019. He would score more points – not to mention save the taxpayers millions – if he just went ahead and scrapped the detail now. (If he still feels the need for protection, he could always hire his own security detail.)
3. Take a pass on the easy payday. After Truman left office he was inundated with lucrative business proposals. Although he needed the money – he was not a rich man, and ex-presidents did not receive pensions until 1958 – Truman spurned the offers because he refused to “commercialize” the presidency. He even turned down exorbitant speaking fees, usually collecting only a small honorarium, which he donated to his library. It seems an impossibly quaint notion today, but Bush would do well to emulate it. Besides, he doesn’t need the money. In 2007 he reported assets of more than $7 million, and, as an ex-president, he now receives an annual pension of $190,000 plus expenses.
Removed from the warm cocoon of power, a new ex-president is bound to stumble occasionally along the rocky road to becoming, as Truman put it, a “plain ordinary citizen.” Dwight Eisenhower, long accustomed to minions taking care of quotidian chores such as shopping, reportedly had to be taught how to carry and handle money when he became an ex. (As president, he’d once walked out of a sporting goods store without paying for an armload of fishing supplies. The owner sent the White House a bill, which was paid.)
At least Bush, to his credit, has shown himself to be in better touch than Ike. At that hardware store, he bought flashlights, batteries, a can of WD-40, and some night-lights – and he paid for it all by himself.
comments powered by Disqus
William J. Stepp - 5/5/2009
...we should be so lucky.
In refusing to "commercialize" the presidency, Truman committed himself to continue relying on resources stolen from taxpayers. Apparently, he never made an honest dime (i.e., one originating in a market-based, private sector transaction) in his life, having failed early in his career as a haberdasher, then turning to government "work" for the rest of his tax-funded career.
His stance reflected his reflexive anti-market, pro-government thinking.
Too bad that, because if he had "commercialized" the presidency after leaving the White House, maybe Congress wouldn't have funded post-presidential retirement incomes.
What do they make now?--$200,000 per year?
Clinton, who makes millions from speeches, should lead the way by calling for the repeal of the 1958 taxpayer ripoff. Dubya was worth what?, 15 big ones when he was inaugurated the first time.
If someone is a good enough demagoguer to become prexy of the U.S., then he's a good enough "song-and-dance man" to fund his own retirment, and to stop stealin' from me and my fellow taxpayers.
Vito Danelli - 5/4/2009
Here's a variation of a familar quote: "History is written by the victors".
I think Truman achieved near-sainthood because he recognized the state of Israel in 1948, despite of contrary advice from Clark Clifford and others.
Bush is simply an arrogance and ignorant person; a dangerous combination in any person, especially a manager/CEO/President.
Truman didn't have a Karl Rove type scumbag on his staff, plus the only media in Harry's day was radio, newsreels, and TV that was in its early infancy.
George W Bush is a person who wouldn't be anywhere in life if it weren't for his father and grandfather.
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing