David Irving: A Historian with a Past Few Are Willing to ForgetHistorians in the News
If David Irving had not decided to sue an obscure American academic and Penguin Books for allegedly defaming him, his reputation as a historian might, at least to the uninformed, have survived a little longer.
He did not have the academic credentials now normally required of professional historians and he was not an academic, but he had over the years won the grudging respect of academics for the stamina and assiduity with which he worked in the archives to produce material not seen before.
Writers as eminent as Sir Winston Churchill's biographer, Sir Martin Gilbert, military historian Sir Michael Howard, and Hugh Trevor- Roper, author of the brilliant classic work on the last days of Adolf Hitler, had all been prepared to praise him for the energy with which he conducted his research.
Since the 1960s, Irving has been prolific. He has concentrated on the central figures or events of World War 2, producing large volumes on the bombing of Dresden, and on Goering, Goebbels, Churchill, Rommel and Hitler.
For all his energy, however, there have been doubts from the beginning about the conclusions he drew from his research.
In one of his earliest books, about a British convoy taking supplies to Murmansk in northern Russia during World War 2, he accused a British officer of cowardice leading to the destruction of the convoy.
A court found that this was a gross libel, and awarded damages against him of 40,000, a huge sum at the time.
In the late 1970s, he published Hitler's War, a "revisionist" work which set out to distance Hitler from responsibility for the Jewish Holocaust.
Reviewing it for the London Sunday Times, Hugh Trevor-Roper conceded that the work had some merit, but he crushingly concluded that Irving was not to be trusted.
"We can never quite be sure, and when he is most original, we are least likely to be sure."
He found that Irving wrote with a "consistent bias".
comments powered by Disqus
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Newly released interactive map shows images of destroyed monuments of Mosul
- How the Rise of the Post Office Explains American Innovation
- These Americans are reliving history and don’t mind repeating it
- Britain largest home is saved for the nation
- Shelter and the slums: capturing bleak Britain 50 years ago
- WSJ features an article by a conservative calling for the abolition of Black History Month
- Mary Beard, herself a bestselling author, wonders why more women historians aren't
- Princeton U. historian Imani Perry claims mistreatment in parking ticket arrest
- Retired historian George Dennison remains on the payroll at the U. of Montana while faculty are cut
- The Atlantic profiles exciting ways to teach history