Presidents and stocks: History suggests '09 could be a doozy

Breaking News

The nation's new president has been compared to FDR. His economic views go by the catchy code word Obamanomics. The transition of power at the White House is always a big deal on Wall Street — but never more so than this year with the stock market, banking system and economy in the throes of the worst crisis since the 1930s.

Enter President Obama, a politician with JFK-like charisma and high approval ratings. Wall Street and Main Street are counting on him to be Mr. Fix-it.

Not only has Obama inherited a financial mess of historic proportions, he is also facing what market historians at the Stock Trader's Almanac refer to as the "post-election-year syndrome": The first year of a presidential term has historically been the worst for stocks.

"In the four-year presidential cycle, the first year is usually the toughest," says Jeffrey Kleintop, strategist at LPL Financial.

In post-election years since 1871, the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index finished higher only 56% of the time, says Ned Davis Research. That's well below the 74% of gains in pre-election years, 69% in election years and 59% in midterm election years.

comments powered by Disqus