Darwin’s Great Work Was ...
Charles Darwin’s great voyage of discovery was—it is generally thought—to have been to the Galapagos Islands. Actually, the ones that occupied most of his time and attention were to the garden in his backyard. While Darwin made one trip to the Galapagos, in a voyage lasting five years, he spent more than 40 years on a single experimental project in his own English garden at Down House in Kent. This project involved an examination of earthworm poop, to try and figure out just what role earthworms played in the ecology of the soil.
Over a period of decades, Darwin observed the earthworms in his garden; studying their physiology; their behavior; and, especially, their role in fertilizing the soil. Many a night Darwin would take one or more of his children out into the garden to hold a lantern whilst he probed in the soil to uncover the nocturnal activities of the resident Down House worms. He strewn cinders from the family hearth in a patch over the garden ground and waited, decades, while the earthworms buried the cinders in coat after coat of earthworm dung. Periodically, Darwin and the children would venture out with shovel in hand to dig small trenches to record the depth of the sinking cinders. This went on for over forty years. One might fairly say, Darwin was obsessed with this topic. Here is how he described the great work, in his last book, published just six months before his death:
As I was led to keep in my study during many months worms in pots filled with earth, I became interested in them, and wished to learn how far they acted consciously, and how much mental power they displayed. . . . In the year 1837, a short paper was read by me before the Geological Society of London . . . in which it was shown that . . . [a] large quantity of fine earth continually [is] brought up to the surface by worms in the form of castings. These castings are sooner or later spread out and cover up any object left on the surface. I was thus led to conclude that all the vegetable mould over the whole country has passed many times through, and will again pass many times through, the intestinal canals of worms.
This rather earthy observation was the start of Darwin’s experiments with earthworms and their impact on the ecology of the soil. Darwin also invested considerable time and effort in studying the mentality of worms, to see if, for example, they were sensible to music (no, according to Darwin). Darwin was so impressed by the ceaseless labors of his segmented neighbors that he would be moved to conclude: “It may be doubted whether there are many other animals which have played so important a part in the history of the world, as have these lowly organized creatures.”
Among Darwin’s more than twenty published books (including his posthumously published autobiography), his 1856 On the Origin of Species was not his most successful. Several of Darwin’s books outsold Origin during Darwin’s lifetime, and his contributions to marine biology, botany, zoology and geology were all thought by his contemporaries to be of more significance than his work on evolution. Indeed, his book on his earthworm research appeared in October 1881 and was available for barely half-a-year before Darwin’s death. Even so, it outsold On the Origin of Species (which had been in print for more than 20 years) during Darwin’s lifetime. As far as Darwin knew, his study of earthworm poop seemed to have had a bigger impact on the world than his theory of evolution.
Such are the weird and wonderful ways of real history.
1 Darwin, Charles. The Formation of Vegetable Mould Through the Action of Worms, With Observations on Their Habits,(London, John Murray, Albermarle Street, printed by William Clowes and Sons, Limited, 1881): 2-4.
2 Ibid., 313.
comments powered by Disqus
Donald Wolberg - 2/16/2009
Mr. DeWitt's observations of Darwin's life and work is interesting and valuable; too often our understanding of the "lives of accomplishment" are reduced to almost meaningless sentences and popular misconceptions, and too frequently we judge the past within the context of the present.
Indeed, Darwin's earthworn studies opened new paths to ecology, as is quite in keeping with the adventure of his life. The "Origin," published 150 years ago, was momentous and culminated decades of observations and insights carefully recorded and almost forever annotated by Darwin. Had not Alfred Russell had a momemnt of inspiration and written Darwin, the Origin likely would not have been published for another 20 years. Darwin referred to the published work as an "abstract" of his greater work to come. As it was, the Origin found only John Murray willing to be the publisher, a fact Murray found significant after it sold out almost immediately and went through many editions. Our distance from the world of 150 years ago, makes it difficult to appreciate the intellectual and emotional impacts the "new heresy" had on the world. In possibly the still best read biography of Darwin and Huxley, William Irvines's "Apes, Angels and Victorians," a line from Disraeli's 1864 Oxford speech is quoted:
"What is the question now placed before society with a glib assurance the most astounding? The question is this - Is man ape or an angel? My Lord, I am on the side of the angels."
Mr. DeWitt is correct that Darwin did so much more work than just the Origin, and he published thousands of pages including very significant work in geology, botany, invertebrate zoology, vertebrate zoology biogeography, comparative behavior studies, as well as that all encompassing explanation of evolution. Darwin was correct in his prediction that the origins of humanity would be found in Africa, that there was an explanation for the formation of coral atolls, and his great work on barnacles, Steve Gould observed, was the best on the topic ever. Darwin's Journal(s) of the Beagle voyage make great reading still, as does the Origin, although one wonders how many actually read these volumes any more. The fact is inescapable that Darwin was a very good, very careful writer of clarity and precision.
Dobzhansky once observed, as I recall, that without Darwin and evolution, nothing in biology makes sense. Dennett likened evolution by natural selection as an acid that cut through all that went before. Dawkins is correct in his appraisal of Darwin as central to our comprehension of live through 3.7 billion years of earth history. One hopes that this year, the bicentennial of Darwin's birth will see much more written and said of that great mind.
Gary Ostrower - 2/16/2009
What a good article. While most of us dabble in political and social history, DeWitt gives us the poop (sorry) about an even more important subject. And since we celebrate Darwin's 200th birthday this week, we ought to thank DeWitt for addressing a subject that fertilizes (sorry, again) our understanding of both Darwin and our habitat.
If anyone wants to follow up this earthworm story, check out the books of Jerry Minnich (Earthworm Book) and David Ernst (Earthworm Handbook)
- Did a historian who said he’s a victim of McCarthyism get the story wrong?
- Stephanie Coontz’s work on the history of marriage cited by the Supreme Court.
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- David Hackett Fischer wins $100,000 prize for lifetime achievement in military writing