Dirty Campaign Trick: The Phony Charles Murchison Letter Upended Grover Cleveland's 1888 Presidential BidRoundup: Talking About History
The race hinged on New York State's 36 electoral votes. "As New York went, so went the election," says historian Rick Shenkman of George Mason University. It should have been no problem for Cleveland, who had been both the state's governor and mayor of Buffalo. Yet he was vulnerable in New York's sizable Irish community after his administration negotiated a fisheries treaty with the British Empire, which was hated by the Irish. George Osgoodby, a Republican in California, sent a letter to the British ambassador to the United States under the pretense that he was a British expatriate named Charles Murchison who wanted to know the candidate who would best "favor England's interests." When the ambassador endorsed Cleveland, he unknowingly stepped into the Republicans' trap; the party trumpeted his letter around the country as evidence that Cleveland had been pro-British all along.
After the ballots were cast two weeks later, Cleveland had beaten Harrison in the popular vote by 100,000, but he had only 168 electoral votes to Harrison's 233. The Republican had won all 36 of New York's votes.
Was the Murchison letter decisive? Most historians agree that it was quite harmful to Cleveland. "Whoever was Irish and voting probably was offended by the Murchison letter," says Henry Graff, professor emeritus of history at Columbia University and author of a 2002 biography of Cleveland.
Another biographer, Alyn Brodsky, called the Murchison letter "the filthiest dirty campaign trick ever pulled because it literally destroyed a presidency." Nevertheless, it didn't end Cleveland's political career. Upon her departure from the White House, Cleveland's wife was reported to have told the staff not to change anything because she would be back in four years. She proved prescient when Cleveland won the 1892 election and became the nation's only president elected to two nonconsecutive terms.
comments powered by Disqus
Susie Russell-Melendez - 3/25/2008
George Osgoodby is my ancestor. My father's name is Andrew Osgoodby Russell. We are all from southern California.
I am doing geneology for my family and want to thank you for having this Murchison Letter information available. I'm looking for any other information on it if anyone has more.
- Smithsonian launches campaign to raise $10 million for women’s history initiative
- Trump Was Not Always So Linguistically Challenged
- 75th anniversary of the World War 2 black uprising that the American public never heard about
- Longest serving governor in U.S. history to resign after confirmation as Trump's ambassador to China
- Did the First Human Ancestor Emerge in Europe, Not Africa?
- Jill Lepore: Americans Aren't Just Divided Politically, They're Divided Over History Too
- AHA joins protest of Trump’s plan for drastic cuts to the NEH
- Diane Ravitch says the Democrats paved the way for the education secretary's efforts to privatize our public schools
- Mark Moyar explains why he came to believe the Vietnam War was winnable
- How should Texas high schoolers learn history?