Medieval diets 'far more healthy'
Their low-fat, vegetable-rich diet - washed down by weak ale - was far better for the heart than today's starchy, processed foods, one GP says.
And while they consumed more they burnt off calories in a workout of 12 hours' labour, Dr Roger Henderson concludes.
But the Shropshire GP accepts that life for even prosperous peasants was tough.
But after examining the available records, Dr Henderson suggests that medieval meals were perhaps even better than the much touted "Mediterranean" diet enjoyed by the Romans.
comments powered by Disqus
John R. Maass - 12/22/2007
They also did not have McDonalds.
Bert S Hall - 12/19/2007
There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the diets of the medieval poor (though not those of the rich) were in fact healthier than their modern counterpart. These insights should be qualified by recognition that this was the case when times were good, i.e. in the absence of natural or man-made famines. Death rates in the middle ages were conditioned by organic diseases far more than by "lifestyle choices."
- Hero Marine Dad Will Unleash Hell Itself If Daughter’s World History Class Says Muslims Are Real
- Historians Against the War joins peace activists in pressing Congress to support a diplomatic solutions to conflict with Iran over nukes
- Despite new hires, Yale history department retains vacancies
- African-American Professor: Reagan Did More To Help Black Education Than Obama
- Turning West, Historians Take a Wider View of Early America