Shock as owner of 300-year-old diary in BL custody finds it ruined
Its private owner, a descendant of Thomas Tyldesley, the diary’s author, has described how he “wanted to weep” when he collected the 96-page manuscript last week and discovered that someone had spilt oil across its pages –- staining them and making some of them completely illegible. Its original leather front cover had also been cut off.
Peter J. Tyldesley, a solicitor and consultant for the Law Commission, said that a vital part of national history had been lost. In its original condition, the document would be likely to raise a high five-figure sum at auction. “There are sections which are completely destroyed, sections where the entire text block has disappeared into a smeary mess,” Mr Tyldesley said...
He told The Times: “I thought the British Library was the safest place for it. How wrong I was.”
Within the manuscript, Thomas Tyldesley (1657-1715)...detailed everyday life and political events, as well as the plotting and the intrigue with which his family was involved in their pursuit of the Jacobite cause...
The British Library told The Times that the diary had “suffered accidental damage”, but insisted that it was an “isolated incident”. Helen Shenton, the library’s head of collection care, said: “The book had been kept in safe storage in a protective box and it was not until the book was opened that the stains were discovered.”
comments powered by Disqus
- 'Sexist' Paris streets renamed in the name of feminism
- NYT profiles a path-breaking transgender pioneer who became a judge
- CIA Plans Huge Release of Top-Secret Reports From the 1960s
- South Dakota drops history as a high school requirement
- The Forgotten History Of 'Violent Displacement' That Helped Create The National Parks
- Historian author Antony Beevor says his new World War 2 book may anger Americans
- Ron Radosh and Allis Radosh plan to defend Warren Harding in a new book
- Historians tackle America’s mass incarceration problem
- Report: Russian studies in crisis
- Ken Burns: Donald Trump’s birtherism — a “politer way of saying the ‘N-word'” — proves America isn’t remotely “post-racial”