David Irving: controversial historian in Hungary for book signing, speeches
Due to remain in Hungary for one week for book signing events, Irving is expected to speak at the extreme-right Hungarian Justice and Life Party (MIÉP) party rally on March 15. Following an appeal, Irving was released on probation from an Austrian prison last December after serving part of a three year sentence for Holocaust denial. In March of last year, during an interview with Die Presse and the Austrian Press Agency, Irving likened Austria to a "Nazi state" and criticized the country's strict laws against denying the Holocaust as "ridiculous."...
comments powered by Disqus
Randll Reese Besch - 3/21/2007
The definition of such is that people can say the wrong,insulting,stupid and isensitive but rebuttle is allowed to counter the misinformation.David Irving revels in being downtrodden with his enemies action are the mirror of what a society like the one Irving wants. This lack of freedom by imposition of police power is wrong. It emboldens the false pronouncements of Irving's about "freedom of speech" being "real" and his oppressors being a "Nazi State" in a funhouse mirror of reverse perceptions. Irving,I must remind,wants a Nazi State!The difference is he isn't part of the power structure to eliminate any speech not consonant with the prevailing ethos, as practiced.
In summation,"free speech" is that all sides can freely be heard,not just what is "acceptable."
- Could another English king be buried under a parking lot?
- Huckabee says archaeology supports the Bible
- George W. Bush's CIA Briefer: Bush and Cheney Falsely Presented WMD Intelligence to Public
- Unfinished film about the Holocaust made in 1945 to finally be seen by audiences
- Two-Thirds of European Men Descend From Three People
- Daniel Pipes calls the rulers of Iran "madmen" on official Iranian TV
- A Professor Tries to Beat Back a News Spoof That Won’t Go Away
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- Sean Wilentz is being called “Hillary’s Historian"
- Hundreds of British historians challenge assumptions of “Historians for Britain” campaign