Museum, veterans continue battle in Canada
Vets charge that the panel implies that they performed a cruel deed with little strategic value. The disputed text reads: "The value and morality of the strategic bombing offensive against Germany remains contested. Bomber Command's aim was to crush civilian morale and force Germany to surrender by destroying its cities and industrial installations. Although Bomber Command and the American attacks left 600,000 Germans dead and more than five million homeless, the raids resulted in only a small reduction in German war production until late in the war."
Art Smith, a vet leading the attack, insists, "Ten thousand crewmen didn't make it back. It really distresses me that people want to knock their memory." A former MP, he is lobbying for a private member's bill to force a rewrite of the text.
In December, military historian Jack Granatstein commented, "I'd hate to see a private member's bill. You shouldn't have political interference in a reputable museum, one where every exhibit is weighed in a scholarly way." However, he has since joined the museum board and is no longer in a position to comment.
"The museum has asked for independent expert advice on the panel in question," said Mark O'Neill, museum vice-president of public affairs. "We'll have their analysis within the next few months. Then we'll assess the situation."
Yesterday, Oda said, "The museum has been in discussion with Art Smith. But I have not decided to take further action at this point and we await their report."
comments powered by Disqus
- Roman Gladiators ate a mostly vegetarian diet and drank a tonic of ashes after training
- Massachusetts is celebrating the 250th anniversary of the wedding of John and Abigail Adams
- King Tut had overbite, club foot because his parents were brother and sister
- Prehistoric humans were far smarter than previously assumed
- Priests race to save manuscripts from jihadists in Iraq
- Niall Ferguson Joins Schwarzman Scholars as Distinguished Visiting Professor in China
- Highlights of the recent Oral History Association Meeting
- Rick Perlstein response to Sam Tanenhaus's complaint that he's an aggregator
- Thai historian faces charges for daring to challenge a story about a royal king