Veto in California on Electoral CollegeBreaking News
Saying it ran “counter to the tradition of our great nation,” Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill on Saturday that would have automatically allocated all the state’s 55 electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate received the national popular vote.
The bill, which passed the state’s Legislature this summer, was devised by John R. Koza, a computer scientist who envisioned a system in which a series of states holding the number of electoral votes needed to elect a president — 270 — would commit their electors to casting ballots for the winner of the popular vote, regardless of how their individual electorates voted.
comments powered by Disqus
DM Jordan - 10/4/2006
"...devised by John R. Koza, a computer scientist who envisioned a system in which a series of states holding the number of electoral votes needed to elect a president — 270 — would commit their electors to casting ballots for the winner of the popular vote, regardless of how their individual electorates voted."
Schwarzenegger was correct. The people of California should find it troubling that their vote for President could have gone to George W. Bush in 2004 when that was clearly not THEIR expressed choice. This runs counter to the Constitutional Principle of Federalism, and plays into the still-visible fears that a faction from a minority of the states of the Union could somehow control the outcome of the Presidential race. Should the outcomes of the vote in the nation's 7 or 8 largest cities be able to determine the path for the rest of this vast country? The Framers wanted a President who was not reflective of the whims of the most populous state, but could garner a national appeal. The did take into account the popular will. It's already there! The Electoral College blends both Population as well as Equality of the States (# of Reps + # of Senators), so the electoral vote usually reflects the popular vote anyway. Of course, I mention nothing that anyone here shouldn't already be aware of. This continued panic of a Constitutional crisis from 2000 is surely unwarranted--only 4 elections have not gone the way of the electoral vote, and only one since 1888.
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Newly released interactive map shows images of destroyed monuments of Mosul
- How the Rise of the Post Office Explains American Innovation
- These Americans are reliving history and don’t mind repeating it
- Britain largest home is saved for the nation
- Shelter and the slums: capturing bleak Britain 50 years ago
- WSJ features an article by a conservative calling for the abolition of Black History Month
- Mary Beard, herself a bestselling author, wonders why more women historians aren't
- Princeton U. historian Imani Perry claims mistreatment in parking ticket arrest
- Retired historian George Dennison remains on the payroll at the U. of Montana while faculty are cut
- The Atlantic profiles exciting ways to teach history