State Department Condemns Israel's Attack on the USS LibertyRoundup: Talking About History
Elise Labott, writing in CNN.com (Jan. 12, 2004):
After reviewing documents dating back 36 years, the State Department has concluded that Israel's attack on a U.S. spy ship in 1967 was an act of gross negligence for which it should be held responsible.
The USS Liberty was attacked off the Egyptian coast June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War, while gathering electronic intelligence. The attack killed 34 Americans and injured another 171.
"In many respects this is kind of a classic bi-national case of Murphy's Law," a State Department official said Monday."Everything that could possibly go wrong, on either side, did."
The official said that though Israel should be held responsible for the attack, the United States was also negligent for failing to notify Israel the Liberty was in international waters and for failing to withdraw the ship from the war zone.
"This is a ship that should have been hundreds of miles away from the war zone," the official said.
Israel fought the combined forces of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and other Arab states, emerging victorious after six days.
The State Department opened a two-day conference on U.S. foreign policy during the period, with a panel dealing with the USS Liberty attack. The conference was scheduled around the release of historical documents about the war.
The Israelis have always said the attack on the Liberty, which was monitoring communications in the war, was a tragic accident. The Johnson administration never formally challenged the Israelis' account. But some survivors and senior U.S. officials at the time have said they believe the attack was a deliberate effort to stop American surveillance of Israeli activities during the conflict.
In July the National Security Archive released tapes of Israeli pilots and ground control speaking in Hebrew, along with English transcripts. The recordings were made by a nearby American surveillance aircraft after the attack. ( Full story )
The NSA released the tapes and transcripts under the Freedom of Information Act in response to a request from Judge Jay Cristol of Miami, Florida. Cristol, who wrote a book about the attack, said the tapes show it was a tragic accident in a time of war -- that the Israelis mistook the ship for an Egyptian one.
"There was no indication they had any knowledge they were attacking a U.S. ship," Cristol told participants at the conference.
The State Department official said that though some maintain the Israeli military was too good to make such a mistake,"if they were that good and if they were that efficient and they deliberately sought to sink a ship, they damned well would have sunk it."
- USS Liberty: Historians Debate by HNN Staff
- When Did the U.S. and Israel Become Allies? (Hint: Trick Question) by Jay Cristol
- USS Liberty: Israel Did Not Intend to Bomb the Ship by Jay Cristol
- James Bamford , USS Liberty: Cover Up
- USS Liberty: Eyewitness Account by James Ennes
- USS Liberty: False Allegations of Anti-Semitism by Yomin Postelnik
- USS Liberty: Review of The History Channel Documentary by Judith Klinghoffer
comments powered by Disqus
- Irish artist is colorizing the past
- Frontline does Trump & Clinton
- This New York Times ‘Hitler’ book review sure reads like a thinly veiled Trump comparison
- Chicago Tribune editorial: The government should release secret grand jury testimony about its 1942 scoop, "Jap Plan to Strike at Sea"
- US owes blacks reparations over slavery: UN experts
- Howard Zinn group backs move to "Abolish Columbus Day"
- Ted Widmer appointed director of John W. Kluge Center
- What Historians Are Saying About the First Trump-Clinton Debate
- Princeton professor documents the movement that ended single-sex education at elite schools
- Annette Gordon-Reed tells historians the controversy over Harvard law school's shield is different from the fight over the Confederate flag