Iraq War Is Drawing Less Support Than Vietnam Did at Same Stage
Today, at the same juncture in the Iraq war, about 2,400 American soldiers have died, the U.S. military consists entirely of volunteers and public dissent is sporadic.
There's one other difference: The war in Iraq is more unpopular than was the Vietnam conflict at this stage, polls show.
More Americans -- 57 percent -- say sending troops to Iraq was a mistake than the 48 percent who called Vietnam an error in April 1968, polls by the Princeton, New Jersey-based Gallup Organization show. That's because more people believed that Vietnam was crucial to U.S. security, scholars say.
``People simply value the stakes much lower in Iraq than they did in Vietnam,'' said John Mueller, a presidential historian at Ohio State University in Columbus. Vietnam ``seemed vital in terms of the Cold War and stopping the communists. People don't see this as an important adventure.''
The poll numbers suggest that President George W. Bush may come under overwhelming pressure from voters to resolve the war, as did President Lyndon B. Johnson 38 years ago, even though both men vowed to stay the course.
comments powered by Disqus
Vernon Clayson - 5/16/2006
The Vietnam War didn't become unpopular until Richard Nixon became president, prior to that the media made it appear to be a worthwhile war because JFK and LBJ were in office. Even now it is most often cited as Nixon's war and he wound it down from peaks that LBJ built. LBJ, although a crude thug, recognized the war was untenable and chose not to run again, Nixon, also a crude thug, made it his job to get us out of the war and succeeded, becoming the only president to lose a war. His later actions were less than honorable but his resignaiion was, pity Bill Clinton didn't have that measure of honor.
- New PBS DVD From Henry Louis Gates Jr. Explores African Influence on the Caribbean
- The Council on Foreign Relations Honors Kissinger Critic
- Architectural historian discovers Chartres Cathedral has started faking it
- Rick Perlstein hits back at a critic of his book on Reagan
- So Historians Are Surprised by What DNA Can Tell Us?