Dan Brown Says He Used Historians' Ideas, Among Others in Writing Da Vinci Novel
On his third and final day in the witness box, the 41-year-old expressed frustration during a grueling session of cross-examination in the closely-watched copyright case at London's High Court.
Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh wrote a 1982 book of historical conjecture called ``The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,'' which they claim Brown lifted wholesale for his novel.
Random House argues that neither Brown nor his wife Blythe had read the 1982 Holy Blood book by the time he composed the synopsis for The Da Vinci Code in January, 2001.
Justice Peter Smith sought to clarify the point, asking the claimants' lawyer, Jonathan Rayner James: ``Do you accept Mr. Brown's evidence as to when he said he first saw Holy Blood, Holy Grail?''
Rayner James replied: ``Mr. Brown denies it. We say his wife had it by that time.''
comments powered by Disqus
- The Story Behind ‘Woman in Gold’: Nazi Art Thieves and One Painting’s Return
- Scott Walker, Allergic to Dogs, May Run Against Political History
- Russian History Receives a Makeover That Starts With Ivan the Terrible
- Parsing Ronald Reagan’s Words for Early Signs of Alzheimer’s
- Here's a look at history of 'religious freedom' laws
- Charlatan or Sage? Contested Legacy of the late Dr. Ben, a Father of African Studies
- Historians make it easy for visitors to DC to understand the history of the Mall
- History's Grandin Wins Bancroft Prize for "The Empire of Necessity"
- Nobel prize-winning scientist writes a history of science
- Ken Burns tackles history of cancer