Bugs Caused Most Deaths in Civil WarBreaking News
"I think the beauty of looking at the insects is it's a topic that we all can relate to," he said. "Few of us can relate to combat."
Mr. Miller is a professional entomologist who describes new species for the United States Department of Agriculture. His blend of bug expertise with the War Between the States is strictly a hobby, he said.
The bugs-and-war fascination started in college, he said, when research for a Civil War course paper on "soldier life" led to an unexpected trend. "Here were all these references to insects," he said. "You find out insects played a role in every part of soldiering."
Civil War soldiers were encamped in conditions that were awful for humans, but great for insects.
"One of the things that most people aren't aware of when they think of the Civil War is the number of people and associated animals," Mr. Miller said. "[Armies] weren't mechanized. They had to rely on horses and mules."
Soldiers would sometimes travel with 8,000 to 10,000 head of cattle, providing plenty of food for flies, he said. Soldiers already wracked by diarrhea or dysentery often had to deal with mosquito-borne malaria as well. If that wasn't bad enough, he said, soldiers' food was usually infested.
Mr. Miller owns an original letter by a soldier after the fall of Vicksburg, who wrote there were insects in "every biteful of food."
Desperation led to quirky delousing methods. Soldiers practiced "skirmishing," squishing bugs and lice with their thumb and forefinger on their bodies. Often, they boiled their clothes.
Historians say the Civil War was the last major war fought before scientists realized that microbes carried disease, so treatment was limited, Mr. Miller said. Quinine from South America was the best treatment for malaria, but the Union blockade led to price gouging.
In 1862, an ounce of quinine cost about $5, Mr. Miller said. By the end of the war, the going price in some places was $500 to $600 per ounce. The average Union private made $16 per month.
"I try not to sugarcoat things," he said at a recent presentation in Bethesda, Md. "I'm not overly graphic with the info, but the topic is war, and it's not fun and games."
comments powered by Disqus
- Trump Holds Wide Lead in South Carolina
- An All-or-Nothing Fight for the Supreme Court
- Did Trump Really Lose the Debate?
- Scalia’s Death Sets Off Epic Battle
- Democrats See Gift in GOP Blocking Court Nominee
- Quote of the Day
- The Nastiest GOP Debate
- Reaction to the Republican Debate
- The GOP Presidential Debate
- How Clinton Could Respond on Supreme Court Vacancy
- Trump and Clinton Way Ahead in South Carolina
- McConnell Says Senate Will Wait to Replace Scalia
- Antonin Scalia Is Dead
- Clinton Says Sanders Would Be Threat to Obama Legacy
- Internal Tracker Shows Trump Leading in South Carolina
- Ben Carson used an apparently fake Joseph Stalin quote — and the Internet loved it
- Rubio exaggerates in saying it's been 80 years since a 'lame duck' made a Supreme Court nomination
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges