Spielberg's Munich triggers a divided response among initial viewers
But the filmmaker's tale of the Israeli hit team avenging the 1972 massacre of 11 of its Olympic athletes is already dividing viewers. One of the year's most anticipated movies and a potential Oscar contender, "Munich" has triggered debate among audiences -- including Oscar voters -- who have been the first to see it.
Some are finding fault with how the film tries to balance the initial terrorist act with the retaliation that followed. Others are challenging the historical accuracy of the book "Vengeance," by George Jonas, upon which the movie was based. While some commend Spielberg for creating multidimensional characters in an attempt to humanize the conflict, not everyone is applauding that approach.
As Spielberg avoids the traditional junketeering on the eve of the film's premiere, the marketing forces have staged screenings for community leaders and opinion-makers in Los Angeles, Washington, Berlin, Munich, Paris and Tel Aviv.
Heading the effort in Israel, where the movie has triggered mixed response: one of Ariel Sharon's top strategists, Eyal Arad. Last week, a screening held for the widows of two of the slain athletes was attended by producer Kathleen Kennedy and writer Tony Kushner, who have been touring Europe with the film.
comments powered by Disqus
Lorraine Paul - 12/26/2005
If Spielberg's films trigger debate on a sensitive subject such as what happened at the Munich Olympics isn't that a good thing?
Would that "Hollywood" made more films for questioning adults rather than testosterone fueled teens.
Congratulations to Aussie Eric Bana; from watching the trailer it appears that he has hit his straps as an actor!!
- David Rosand, an Art History Scholar Whose Heart Was in Venice, Dies at 75
- NYT interviews Rick Perlstein about his book
- OAH issues a statement in support of the AP standards
- Daniel Pipes says in interview that the absence of anti-Israel protests in Muslim countries is highly significant
- A historian who studies China has discovered an overlooked angle in the debate about the Middle East. Could he have figured out a key reason for Iraq’s failure to defeat ISIS?