Jean Edward Smith bio of Bush II laudedHistorians in the News
tags: George W Bush
Rarely in the history of reviewing presidential biographies for major American newspapers has the nation been so well-served as it has been by The New York Times’ Peter Baker in his review of Bush — Jean Edward Smith’s newly published account of George W. Bush’s presidency.
The highly regarded Smith is best known for penning similar accounts of the presidencies of Ulysses S. Grant and Dwight Eisenhower, in which he cut across history’s grain to force a fresh-eyed evaluation.
But if Bush was hoping that Smith might stand athwart history, shouting “Please clap!” on his behalf ... well, I’m afraid there’s bad news. As Baker notes in one of those perfect if-you’ve-not-got-the-time-to-read-this-book-don’t-worry-I-got-you summations:
"Mr. Smith leaves no mystery where he stands on Mr. Bush’s place in history. The first sentence of his book: 'Rarely in the history of the United States has the nation been so ill-served as during the presidency of George W. Bush.' " ...
comments powered by Disqus
- Karen L. Cox says historians shouldn’t be afraid to embrace YouTube to reach millennials
- You Know Your History? These Podcasts Aren’t So Sure.
- Victor Davis Hanson says Trump Must "Retire as Twitter Champ”
- The Daily Mail is highlighting claims by a Cambridge don that teachers are helping to foster resentment by presenting history as the struggle of minority groups
- Historians Are Calling Out Trump Online Whenever He Misreads the Past