At history conference, a few different views of the District during Lincoln’s timetags: Washington D.C., conferences
I can just imagine the look that Kate Masur’s graduate school overlords gave her when she told them she wanted to study the Civil War history of Washington, D.C.
Kate, Kate, Kate, their arched eyebrows must have said. Washington? Really?
“There was a lot of skepticism among my advisers,” Kate said.
Nobody had done much research on the topic. It was thought there wouldn’t be many sources to consult. And even if there were, what was the point? Washington, the thinking goes in some academic circles, is weird: a capital that’s more than a city but less than a state....
comments powered by Disqus
- U.S. Textbook Skews History, Prime Minister of Japan Says
- Recalling a Film From the Liberation of the Camps
- Skull Fossil Offers New Clues on Human Journey From Africa
- Are crude conspiracies right? Research shows nations really do go to war over oil
- Famed SC civil rights protesters have convictions erased
- A powerhouse appropriations subcommittee is now headed by a historian: Republican Rep. Tom Cole (OK)
- Slavic scholars divided over a scholarship sponsored (and withdrawn) by Stephen F. Cohen
- Claire Strom to Step Down as Editor of Agricultural History
- Joan Peters’s legacy assessed by one of her fiercest critics, Norman Finkelstein
- West Point historian says if his cadets can understand the history of war, so can Congress