The Passion of Solomon NorthrupRoundup: Talking About History
tags: slavery, 12 Years a Slave, Solomon Northrup
Eric Herschthal, a history doctoral student at Columbia University, has written for The Daily Beast, The New Republic, The New York Observer, The Millions and other publications.
Critics are already hailing the film adaption of Solomon Northup’s slave narrative, “12 Years a Slave,” as a shoo-in for the Academy Award nominations. But many viewers will likely wonder, given that this is a big-budget film with big-budget actors, how faithful it is to the book. The stakes may seem particularly high for a slave narrative, since many likely believe these books offer an unfiltered view of slavery.
But the question of authenticity gets the underlying medium wrong: Slave narratives were never intended to give an unbiased view. They were antislavery polemics meant to bring down the institution. Though many of the best narratives, including Northup’s, have withstood scholarly scrutiny and are essentially reliable, they still contain inaccuracies, distortions and embellishments.
That fact alone should give us pause in judging the film by a false standard of authenticity. If the film is “true” to anything in the book, it should be true to Northup’s voice, not his facts; that voice is what makes “12 Years a Slave” so enduring....
comments powered by Disqus
- Asp – or ash? Climate historians link Cleopatra's demise to volcanic eruption
- The JFK Document Dump Could Be a Fiasco Say These Two Scholars
- The book Mattis reads to be prepared for war with North Korea
- Civil War’s legacy hangs over a plaque honoring Confederate soldiers
- Confederate statues still stand in rural Virginia
- Historian Keri Leigh Merritt defends activist scholars
- Historian digs into the hidden world of Mormon finances
- A historian who became a business professor?
- Allan Lichtman's response to critics of his book that makes the case for Trump’s impeachment
- "Do We Have To Fight Nazis Again?” asks historian Paul Ortiz