David Barton: Only Four Professors Criticized "The Jefferson Lies"tags: David Barton, David Austin Walsh, Jefferson Lies, Least Credible History Book in Print, Warren Throckmorton
David Austin Walsh is the editor of the History News Network. Follow him on Twitter @DavidAstinWalsh
David Barton in 1994. Credit: Wiki Commons.
David Barton just can't seem to get his facts straight.
The conservative evangelical minister's 2012 book The Jefferson Lies, which argued that rather than a deist who argued for a “wall of separation” between church and state, Thomas Jefferson was in fact an evangelical Christian, was withdrawn from publication by its publisher, Thomas Nelson, last August.
On the Steve Deace Show on July 19, Barton said that only a handful of professors actually criticized his scholarship:
You’ve got about 6,000 universities in America and they found four professors who criticized what I did. Well, 6,000 universities, you probably have 60,000 professors and they found four who didn’t like it.
Warren Throckmorton, one of Barton's biggest critics, a professor of psychology at Grove City College, and co-author of Getting Jefferson Rightalong with fellow Grove City faculty member Michael Coulter, took issue with Barton's statement on his website:
Just four? I think he forgot some. Last August, World Magazine reported that Jay Richards assembled 10 Christian professors who expressed a negative response to the book. Then there was Clay Jenkinson, and Martin Marty, and John Fea, and Paul Harvey, and Regent University’s Chuck Dunn, and Greg Forster, and Gregg Frazer and Steven Green. And then there were the 650 voters in the History News Network poll who helped Barton squeak out the Least Credible History Book in Print designation, just beating out Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States.” Then more recently, 34 Christian history and social science professors approached Family Research Council about the Capitol Tour video (which FRC removed from view due to the errors).
Thus far, Throckmorton's appeal has gotten responses from at least twenty-two professors, not counting academics who earlier criticized Barton.
Deace published a blog post on his website largely dismissing Throckmorton's criticism, noting that “the credibility of the accusers is every bit as fair game as is the credibility of the accused” and that Throckmorton has been criticized “by his fellow evangelicals for abandoning Biblical orthodoxy on issues pertaining to homosexuality.”
Deace did admit that “I don’t know what the truth is here.”
Barton himself told Deace in his radio interview that he is widely criticized by academics, especially Christian academics like Throckmorton, but dismissed the criticism because “Christian professors were basically trained by pagan professors who hate God, and they're just repeating what they're told.”
comments powered by Disqus
- Huckabee says archaeology supports the Bible
- George W. Bush's CIA Briefer: Bush and Cheney Falsely Presented WMD Intelligence to Public
- Unfinished film about the Holocaust made in 1945 to finally be seen by audiences
- Two-Thirds of European Men Descend From Three People
- In Osama bin Laden Library: Illuminati and Bob Woodward
- Daniel Pipes calls the rulers of Iran "madmen" on official Iranian TV
- A Professor Tries to Beat Back a News Spoof That Won’t Go Away
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- Sean Wilentz is being called “Hillary’s Historian"
- Hundreds of British historians challenge assumptions of “Historians for Britain” campaign