Australian conservatives chagrined to learn that a WW I patriot they want schools to celebrate was British, lazy, and undisciplined
A legend has grown up around the life of Pte John Simpson Kirkpatrick, who saved soldiers at Gallipoli by retrieving them from the battlefield and taking them to safety on his donkey.
For nearly a month in 1915 he carried wounded men from the trenches to an aid post on the beach at Anzac Cove until he was shot dead by a Turkish machine-gunner.
Pte Kirkpatrick's self-sacrifice and "mateship" were praised by Brendan Nelson, the education minister.
He said his example should be taught in schools, particularly those with large numbers of Muslim immigrant children.
"He was unarmed and he represents everything at the heart of what it means to be Australian," Mr Nelson said.
But there was embarrassment for the government after historians reminded Canberra that the famous Anzac was born on Tyneside and deserted from the Merchant Navy while in Australia in 1910. He was also a socialist, a trades unionist and a scruffy non-conformist, described by the Australian Dictionary of Biography as "happy to be indolent at times and careless of dress".
To the dismay of ministers intent on bolstering traditional values in the classroom, Kirkpatrick was described by a contemporary as a man who "strongly disliked discipline"
comments powered by Disqus
- CIA Plans Huge Release of Top-Secret Reports From the 1960s
- South Dakota drops history as a high school requirement
- The Forgotten History Of 'Violent Displacement' That Helped Create The National Parks
- Gospel of Jesus’ Wife May Be Authentic, New Tests Suggest
- Architect Sought for Obama’s Presidential Library Complex
- Historian author Antony Beevor says his new World War 2 book may anger Americans
- Ron Radosh and Allis Radosh plan to defend Warren Harding in a new book
- Historians tackle America’s mass incarceration problem
- Report: Russian studies in crisis
- Ken Burns: Donald Trump’s birtherism — a “politer way of saying the ‘N-word'” — proves America isn’t remotely “post-racial”