Stanford history professor questions role of historians as researchers for the defense in such a lawsuitHistorians in the News
The controversy stretches from Gainesville to Palo Alto, Calif., where Stanford University history professor Robert Proctor has publicly identified and criticized historians who work for the tobacco industry. Proctor's discovery that UF graduate students in history were working for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. attorneys led him to e-mail objections to a UF professor, Betty Smocovitis.
Their e-mail exchange caused a legal dispute about whether Proctor tampered with witnesses. Last month, a Volusia County circuit court judge issued a harsh rebuke that said Proctor had intended to harass and humiliate the students to either resign or run the risk of being exposed in national publications...
... Over the past few decades, historians have been witnesses and consultants for tobacco companies. In recent years, Proctor has written about whether historians who lack expertise on the history of tobacco and its health effects should be doing such work.
Proctor is also one of a few historians who testified for plaintiffs suing the tobacco industry. He said the industry was now trying to silence him...
comments powered by Disqus
Alonzo L Hamby - 12/9/2009
As nearly as I can read it, Professor Proctor at Stanford is attempting to intimidate graduate students at the University of Florida because they are doing low-level research for a tobacco company.
I'm sure he would have been equally outraged by the historians who consulted for the desegregationist side in Brown v. Topeka.
Clearly Proctor is an avid defender of academic freedom for everyone who agrees with him--an attitude that is unfortunately too common in academic life today.
Joseph Fitzharris - 12/9/2009
Everyone - including Hitler, Stalin, the Stasi, or tobacco companies - deserves the best defense available, including the best history. To pretend - as Professor Proctor does - that this is inappropriate merely suggests that if HE were in need of such historical research to assist HIM in defending himself, he would refuse it as inappropriate. Right?
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- One of the last remaining Nazis goes on trial in Germany
- Inside story finally told of the young US diplomat who cracked the case of the murder of 4 nuns in El Salvador in 1980
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges
- English professor uses literature to help cure historical amnesia
- WSJ features an article by a conservative calling for the abolition of Black History Month
- Mary Beard, herself a bestselling author, wonders why more women historians aren't