Historian Tsuyoshi Hasegawa disputes Truman's use of A-bombsHistorians in the News
Writer and historian Tsuyoshi Hasegawa knows his World War II endgame subject matter doesn't sit well with some Americans.
"They don't want to hear that maybe America made a mistake," said Hasegawa, a professor of history at the University of California and Santa Barbara and the author of "Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman and Japan's Surrender in the Pacific War."
"I spoke at a place in Oregon that was full of war veterans. Some walked out," he said Friday evening before delivering the Thomas C. Fiddick Memorial Lecture at the University of Evansville.
"I believe the atomic bombs were not as important in bringing about Japan's surrender as the Soviet entry into the Pacific War. Japan was relying on Moscow to mediate the result."...
comments powered by Disqus
Alonzo Hamby - 10/28/2009
Prof. Hasegawa has now openly joined the ranks of scholars who really are not writing history when they decry the use of the atomic bomb.
Of course, Truman wanted to end the war as soon as possible. Can anyone imagine an American president--any possible American president--who would have happily prolonged it?
As I recall Professor Hawegawa's book, he provides no documentation whatever for his assertion that Soviet entry into the war was more important than Hiroshima in Japan's decision to surrender. I do note on the other hand that the Emperor specifically mentioned the bomb.
But this is an issue that gives little credence to empirical evidence.
Stanley Lawrence Falk - 10/28/2009
The Japanese knew that the Russians were going to attack and that Moscow wouldn't accept Japan's proferred terms (their own ambassador told them that). If the Soviet entry was such a blow, Japan could have accepted the Potsdam Declaration and spared themselves the Russian assault. The A-bombs ended the war on 14/15 August, and would bave done so even without the Soviet entry.
- Trump Holds Wide Lead in South Carolina
- An All-or-Nothing Fight for the Supreme Court
- Did Trump Really Lose the Debate?
- Scalia’s Death Sets Off Epic Battle
- Democrats See Gift in GOP Blocking Court Nominee
- Quote of the Day
- The Nastiest GOP Debate
- Reaction to the Republican Debate
- The GOP Presidential Debate
- How Clinton Could Respond on Supreme Court Vacancy
- Trump and Clinton Way Ahead in South Carolina
- McConnell Says Senate Will Wait to Replace Scalia
- Antonin Scalia Is Dead
- Clinton Says Sanders Would Be Threat to Obama Legacy
- Internal Tracker Shows Trump Leading in South Carolina
- Ben Carson used an apparently fake Joseph Stalin quote — and the Internet loved it
- Rubio exaggerates in saying it's been 80 years since a 'lame duck' made a Supreme Court nomination
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges