HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! to one and all. I have a good feeling about '04.
Hooray to Dave Barry's 'year in review' column! Barry advises,"2003 is finally, we hope, over. But before we move on, let's put our heads between our knees and take one last look back at this remarkable year."
For more sobering commentary, try David Martin's
Some things are literally unthinkable. For example, Frederick W. Kagan's,"The art of war," an article in the November 2003 issue of The New Criterion, presents compelling evidence that attempting to dominate the world militarily will fail and lead to national ruin, yet Kagan, a teacher of military history at West Point, advocates just such a policy, and apparently sees no need to defend this choice. Excerpts follow:
I've got a year-end essay at The Atlasphere on The Cultural Ascendancy of Ayn Rand. It deals with an increase in Rand references throughout popular culture, from television shows to comic books.
As conservatives and even some libertarians increasingly take a benign and complacent view of American statism, it is encouraging to hear that none other than J.R.R. Tolkien was a friend of liberty and an enemy of centralized power in all forms. Alberto Mingardi at the Mises Economics Blog has found some fascinating quotations from Tolkien on power and anarchy:
As you can see, our software has been modernized. The biggest change for readers is that each blog now includes a comment section. They can also finally have a real hope that the permalinks will actually work! Hopefully, Rick Shenkman and the folks at the History News Network can now have a respite from our pesky and and frantic questions about technical glitches which were legion under the old software. All hail HNN!
You want to see what we're up against? Joanne Jacobs links to an article by Neil Boortz on how bad some economic education really can be.
The children sit in a circle. Some are wearing mittens; others are waiting expectantly with little plastic shovels. The rules of the game state that a few of the children must do nothing but sit and watch as
Mow that Q’addafi is playing nice with Washington and London, hawks on both sides of the Atlantic are boasting even more loudly of the wisdom of the war in Iraq. This screaming hawkishness caused me to recall one of William Gladstone’s early Parliamentary speeches.
The NY Times tells us that James Baker's call to service in Iraq is all well and good, but that he"is far too tangled in a matrix of lucrative private business relationships that leave him looking like a potentially interested party in any debt-restructuring formula. The obvious solution is for him to sever his ties to all firms doing work directly or indirectly related to Iraq." The editorial continues:
The New York Times has an editorial in today's paper on The New Republicans, which argues that the 21st-century GOP has embraced big government in a way that is very much at odds with its allegedly historic support for"smaller government."
That's news to me. The modern GOP has been"me-tooing" the growth of government for most of the 19th and 20th centuries. Some have tried to slow the increase in gove
I have argued, as have many others (including Friedrich Hayek, and historian Barbara Tuchman) that the idea of centrally-planned"nation-building" is a delusion doomed to failure, and that history conclusively demonstrates that not everyone in the world wants freedom in precisely the form in which it has manifested itself in the West, and particularly in
It looks like support for citywide smoking bans is literally
coming out of the woodwork in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Winnipeg
police say that they never would have found the decomposing body of a
DJ hidden in the wall of a local nightclub if it weren't for their city's
smoking ban.
Lindsay Perigo, editor of The Free Radical, a New Zealand-based
libertarian and Objectivist magazine, wrote a piece condemning"Saddam's
Succours" to which I respond in the current issue. In" A Question of
Loyalty: A 'Saddamite' Responds to Perigo," I reply to Perigo's
criticisms of many who opposed the
I have never been a fan of Al Sharpton, but he did a pretty good James
Brown imitation during his monologue last night on"Saturday Night Live."
On the campaign trail, Sharpton has been resident comedian of the
Democratic Party. On hearing that President Bush wanted $87 billion for
his new Great Society program in Iraq, Sharpton said:"Why doesn't Bush
just run for president of Iraq?" But he's been no kinder to his Democratic
foes. Asked if
I just posted some thoughts about Tony Kushner's extraordinary play,"Angels in America," which will be shown on HBO beginning tomorrow night.
And I've offered some ideas about why, even though I disagree with all of
Kushner's explicit political beliefs (he's a committed socialist), I find
the play to be marvelously rewarding. Here is part of what I said:
The play is set in the mid-1980s, but I doubt that you'll find it dated
at all. Even though
Oh great. The Bush people are looking for “unifying national goals” for
the second term. Ideas being kicked around include going to the moon
(again?), extending life spans, and eradicating childhood illnesses.
According to the Washington
Post, “One person consulted by the White House said some aides
appear to relish the idea of a ̵
Can the Bush supporters spell “chutzpah”? On TV they are falling all
over themselves to praise Bush for his political courage in scrapping the
steel tariffs. Excuse me—but who put the tariffs on in the first place?
His courage supposedly lies in his willingness to risk losing the swing
steel states for the sake of free-trade principle. But the supporters
neglect to point out that Bush was getting pressure from a swing
ste