The US Should be Wary of Interfering in CubaNews Abroad
tags: Cuba, Latin American history, Caribbean history
Joseph J. Gonzalez is an Associate Professor of Global Studies at Appalachian State University (NC).
Cubans access a public WiFi hotspot in Havana, 2015.
Photo Othmar Kyas, CC BY-SA 4.0
Cubans have taken to the streets in protest, and the Biden administration is struggling to respond.
On Sunday, July 11, 2021, from Havana to Santiago, Cubans protested in fifty cities, driven by a lack of food, basic services, and freedom, as well as increasing cases of COVID. Cuban authorities cleared the streets by force, detaining hundreds. One participant died.
On Thursday, July 22, the Biden administration sanctioned individuals and entities deemed responsible for the government’s reaction.
History, however, suggests that Americans should be wary of trying to promote democracy in Cuba. For about a century, we have done little else—with unsatisfying results.
For about sixty years, Cuba was a protectorate of the United States. From 1898 to 1959, the United States intervened in Cuban politics regularly, either with soldiers or diplomats, usually in support of a strong man who served American interests first, Cuban interests second.
Neither stability nor democracy followed. Instead, Cubans endured corruption, election fraud, and occasional dictatorships, all the while knowing that they did not live in a sovereign country.
In 1959, Fidel Castro and his barbudos overthrew the last American-supported dictator. In a few short years, Castro’s regime nationalized U.S. businesses, allied itself with the Soviet Union, America’s adversary, and became a socialist dictatorship.
The American response was swift. Hoping to overthrow Castro, Cuban exiles, supported by the CIA, landed at the Bay of Pigs in 1961. They failed, languishing in Castro’s prisons.
After the Bay of Pigs, the Kennedy administration embarked on a guerilla war, sponsoring sabotage and repeated attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro.
The Kennedy administration also imposed an embargo, designed to compel the Castro regime to change its foreign and domestic politics.
Almost sixty years later, the embargo remains in place today—along with the Castro regime, in all its undemocratic glory.
Today Americans are again calling for interventions in Cuba. Their leaders seem to agree, if somewhat vaguely.
Florida’s Governor Ron Desantis, for example, demands “tightening the screws” against the Cuban regime; U.S. Senator Marco Rubio appeals for increased action from the Biden administration; U.S. Representative Val Demings insists that the Biden administration “stand” with the Cuban protestors.
It remains unclear, however, if today’s protestors want or need U.S. intervention.
Born in the 1980s and 1990s, now in their twenties, thirties, and forties, these protestors have seen the Cuban state break its contract with the people.
For better than thirty years, the Castro regime offered a quid pro quo: We will give you the necessities of life, as well as health care and education; in exchange, you will refrain from dissent.
Eventually, the Castros admitted their economic failures and instituted reforms. Most significantly for this generation, the government allowed Cubans to operate private businesses, rather than rely on the state for their livelihoods.
I know these Cubans. They tend to be younger and better educated. They all operate businesses, legal and illegal.
They have smartphones and use WhatsApp to do business and organize politically.
They are what we might call “inclusive,” drawing support from Cubans of colors.
They are not anti-American; most have family and friends who live in the U.S.
But they loathe the U.S. embargo every bit as much as they reject socialist planning; they know that both make their lives more burdensome, their opportunities fewer.
And they feel betrayed by the United States government. In 2015, President Obama promised a new relationship between Havana and Washington, D.C. But President Trump reneged on that promise, in part to appease the Cuban-American community. The Biden administration shows no sign of returning to Obama’s path.
This could be Cuba’s new revolutionary generation. Will America’s leaders refrain from interventions and allow them to create a new nation for themselves?
History suggests that this will be difficult for Americans to do.
History also suggests that it may be necessary.
comments powered by Disqus
- Josh Hawley Earns F in Early American History
- Does Germany's Holocaust Education Give Cover to Nativism?
- "Car Brain" Has Long Normalized Carnage on the Roads
- Hawley's Use of Fake Patrick Henry Quote a Revealing Error
- Health Researchers Show Segregation 100 Years Ago Harmed Black Health, and Effects Continue Today
- Nelson Lichtenstein on a Half Century of Labor History
- Can America Handle a 250th Anniversary?
- New Research Shows British Industrialization Drew Ironworking Methods from Colonized and Enslaved Jamaicans
- The American Revolution Remains a Hotly Contested Symbolic Field
- Untangling Fact and Fiction in the Story of a Nazi-Era Brothel