Do U.S. Strikes Send a ‘Message’ to Rivals? There’s No EvidenceBreaking News
tags: foreign policy, Syria, North Korea, Trump
In the Trump administration’s telling, its missile strike on a Syrian airfield and its dropping of the so-called mother of all bombs over Afghanistan were more than military missions.
They were a signal of American resolve, and of President Trump’s willingness to use force, that would deter adversaries worldwide. ...
The notion that military action in one part of the world will deter adversaries in all others, long common in stump speeches and on cable news chatter, has at times profoundly influenced American foreign policy.
There is only one problem: Repeated investigation has found that this notion is baseless.
Jonathan Mercer, a University of Washington political scientist who studies so-called signaling in foreign policy, said this line of reasoning “drives me crazy.”
His entire field of study, he added, had never found evidence that would support the administration’s claims. ...
comments powered by Disqus
- Medieval Scholars Call for Transparency and Anti-Racism at Conference
- Robert Dallek's FDR Book Invites Comparisons To Trump's Presidency
- Ridley Scott to Adapt Israeli Author's "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" Into a Movie
- Partisans assail historians for judging the past by today’s standards. Here’s why they’re wrong, says classicist
- Whose Medieval Studies?