Adding insult to injury, Trump flirts with classic Holocaust denialRoundup
tags: Holocaust, election 2016, Trump
Chemi Shalev is an Israeli journalist.
In her book "Denying the Holocaust, the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory" - the one that sparked her famous trial with Holocaust denier David Irving, now featured in the Hollywood film Denial - historian Deborah Lipstadt cites a “Yes, but” attitude of some historians towards the Holocaust. “It is a response that falls into the gray area between outright denial and relativism.” she writes. “It is the equivalent of David Duke without robes.”
The Trump administration’s lame excuse for not mentioning Jews on Holocaust Remembrance Day on Friday falls into the category of “Yes, but” excuses, but only if one wants to be generous. By less forgiving accounts, the White House is engaged in full-throttle denial of the Holocaust, which includes denying the centrality of Jews. Yes, six million Jews died, but so did many others, according to spokesperson Hope Hicks. “We took into account all of those who suffered,” she told CNN. “We are an incredibly inclusive group.”
Never mind that for the administration to claim it is “incredibly inclusive” on a day that it takes drastic new measures against Muslim refugees and immigrants shows a stupendous lack in self-perception. “Incredibly inclusive,” by the administration’s standards, apparently means blotting out the unique Jewish nature of the Holocaust and of the Final Solution. Even the United Nations, which established the January 27 International Holocaust Remembrance Day in Resolution 60/7 on November 1, 2005 – at the instigation of the Israeli government, among others – was less stingy than the Trump administration. “Reaffirming that the Holocaust, which resulted in the murder of one third of the Jewish people, along with countless members of other minorities, will forever be a warning to all people of the dangers of hatred, bigotry, racism and prejudice” the resolution states. By Trump’s standards, the UN is apparently too focused on Jews. It’s not “incredibly inclusive” enough.
But forget the UN. How about just looking up the term “Holocaust” in Wikipedia? ”The Holocaust also known as the Shoah was a genocide in which Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany and its collaborators killed about six million Jews. Some definitions of the Holocaust include the additional five million non-Jewish victims of Nazi mass murders, bringing the total to about 11 million.” Some definitions include the others, but none exclude the Jews - except for the one now being disseminated by the Trump administration.
The benign explanation for the administration’s “puzzling and troubling” failure to mention Jews in its original Remembrance Day statement, as ADL National Chairman Jonathan Greenblatt noted, together with Hicks’ insistence that it’s the right thing to do is a. The result of plain ignorance b. Testament to the fact that Trump’s people don’t do their homework c. Further evidence, not that any is needed, that, caught making a mistake, Trump will always double down rather than back down and d. Proof that in doing so, he makes things much worse. It’s only a matter of time before Trump blithely accuses the lyin’ media of overhyping the centrality of the Jews in the Holocaust because they’re out to get him.
The more sinister explanation, on the other hand, is that the original Holocaust Day omission and Hicks’ subsequent clarifications were no mistakes at all. Incredible as it may sound – though no less incredible than other steps and statements made during the past week - the Trump White House is engaging in “Yes, but” relativism which, in many eyes, is to flirt with outright Holocaust denial. It certainly comes perilously close to the form of Holocaust denial outlined by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum by which “the Nazis had no official policy or intention to exterminate the Jews."
But there’s also a far more disturbing and sinister explanation. The Holocaust Day incident connects far too many troubling dots, from Trump’s reluctance to disown Holocaust-denier David Duke during the campaign; his mutual admiration society with Patrick Buchanan, who has questioned key historical elements connected to the extermination of Jews; the connection between White House adviser Stephen Bannon and the alt-right movement, which encompasses a stream of white racists who espouse Holocaust denial; Trump’s insistence on using the loaded slogan of America First, which served supporters of Adolf Hitler and opponents of US intervention in the war against him; and Trump’s repeated reluctance to take Jewish protests and sensitivities into account.
comments powered by Disqus
- Historian David Trowbridge’s Clio app featured as a top humanities project in US
- Juan Cole says Israel is now openly embracing apartheid and racial supremacy
- Historians accuse Croatia of covering up World War II Crimes
- Waitman Wade Beorn: Historians can and should draw parallels between the 1930s and today
- "Never underestimate human stupidity," says historian Yuval Harari whose fans include Bill Gates and Barack Obama