The History That Links Trump and PutinRoundup
tags: Putin, election 2016, Trump
On the front pages of the world’s media, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump are having a transcontinental romance. Putin calls Trump “an outstanding and talented personality,” “the absolute leader in the presidential race.” Never one to turn away a compliment, Trump welcomes Putin’s approval, defending him by pointing out that no one has ever proven that Putin has ever been behind the murder of reporters in Russia. And though Trump in fact trails every Democrat in trial-heat polls, they seem to be looking forward to the chance to deal with one another as the presidents of the world’s two strongest powers.
In many ways, their friendliness makes sense. In fact, these two men are linked by a common historical thread. Its roots go back at least 80 years, well before either one of them were born.
They came into this world, Trump in 1946 and Putin in 1952, in the wake of the victory of the United States and the Soviet Union in the Second World War. To win that war, both the U.S. and the USSR had fostered almost unprecedented levels of civic engagement among their peoples and mobilized extraordinary resources for a common purpose. The Soviet Union under Stalin fought to save the Communist revolution at home, and ultimately to spread it beyond the USSR’s borders as well. The United States under Franklin Roosevelt explicitly fought to spread political liberty and economic justice around the globe. Putin’s father was a sailor, NKVD secret police operative and soldier during the Second World War; Trump’s father, who was already 36 when the war broke out, built housing near booming east coast Navy bases during the conflict, laying the basis for his postwar fortune. By the time their sons Donald and Vladimir were born, however, their nations were at peace, and contesting for world leadership in the Cold War. Both Trump and Putin grew up hearing that their nation was the greatest on earth, the representative of the wave of the future. They grew up in relatively secure worlds, free of economic insecurity or violence. And they grew up in societies that, in very different ways, were organized to serve the common good.
In both the U.S. and the USSR, the next generation’s emergence into adulthood marked a profound cultural change, and eventually led to a profound political one. In the late 1960s Trump’s—and my—generation revolted against our parents’ values of thrift, sacrifice, self-restraint and devotion to the common good, largely as a result of that great betrayal of American ideals, the Vietnam War. By the mid-1970s, young people had transformed American culture and the New Deal tradition of a regulated economy was moribund. Ronald Reagan explicitly repudiated it in 1981, and it has continued to erode ever since. What happened in the Soviet Union was initially less visible but ultimately even more consequential. By the 1970s Soviet youth had also become infatuated with blue jeans, sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll, but they could not openly express themselves in what was still a totalitarian regime. When Leonid Brezhnev and his two successors died in the early 1980s, it became clear that no younger generation shared its elders’ dedication to Communism. The USSR fell apart as soon as Mikhail Gorbachev began to question some its fundamental assumptions in the late 1980s. As in the United States, the postwar generation had rejected the traditions embraced by their parents. ...
comments powered by Disqus
- Charleston Apologizes for City’s Role in Slave Trade
- With 'America First,' Trump Challenges The World Constructed After World War II
- Newly Discovered ‘Limb Pit’ Reveals Civil War Surgeons’ Bitter Choices
- Mark Twain Claimed He Got His Pen Name From a Riverboat Captain
- The story of the slave trade’s last survivor
- Parents, Teachers, Legislators Support Reinstating Passage of U.S. History Test as High School Graduation Requirement in Massachusetts
- Mary Beard on big thinkers and 'sexist rants’
- If postwar history starts in 1951, did the UK Tories ‘blue-wash’ the A-level syllabus?
- Daniel Pipes predicts chaos in the Middle East as countries turn away from fossil fuels
- Stanley Fish says historians are deluded in thinking their training gives them special insights in politics that should be passed on to students (and others)