With support from the University of Richmond
History News Network

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Historians/History
12-2-13

Slim Majority of History PhDs Hold Tenure-Track Jobs

by David Austin Walsh

David Austin Walsh is the editor of the History News Network. Follow him on Twitter @davidastinwalsh.


Image courtesy of study authors.


A slim majority of history PhDs who received their degrees between 1998 and 2009 hold tenure-track positions at four-year colleges and universities, according to a new study from the American Historical Association.

However, nearly one in five history PhDs hold non-tenure-track and/or contingent positions at two- or four-year colleges and universities, and that number is rising.

The study, jointly produced by Maren Wood and Robert Townsend, is generally positive about the job prospects of history PhDs. Of the nearly 2,500 PhDs for whom data was collected, only two were actually unemployed, and, as the authors dryly noted, no PhDs “occupied the positions that often serve as punch lines for jokes … as baristas or short-order cooks.”

African, Asian, and Middle Eastern specialists are the most likely to find tenure-track employment, with Europeanists, North Americanists, and globalists the least likely. However, U.S. history specialists are more likely to be employed in history work outside of academia. Recipients of PhDs from elite institutions are considerably more likely to be employed in tenure-track positions at research universities.

More recent PhDs are considerably more likely to be working in non-tenure-track or contingent positions. A 1995 study found that 21.9 percent of history PhDs in academia were not eligible for tenure, as opposed ti 29.7 percent of academics in Townsend and Wood's sample. Nearly 25 percent of those who received their PhDs between 2006 and 2009 are in non-tenure-track positions, as opposed to approximately 15 percent of the '02 to '05 cohort and 12 percent of '98 to '01.

Around a quarter of history PhDs are employed outside of the academy. The most popular non-academic career tracks are academic administration, non-profits, employment within the federal government (excluding archival positions, which were cataloged separately by the authors), the private sector/business, and K-12 teaching. Fully 75 percent of historians employed outside of the academy were found to be engaged in work that utilizes their historical training.

A small fraction of history PhDs were found employed at libraries, museums, and archives – 1.4 percent of the overall study – and over a third of those so employed also hold either MIS or MLS degrees.

Gender was found to be a statistically insignificant variable overall. Within the academy, women are slightly more likely to hold tenure-track positions, but amongst non-academics, women are more likely to fall under the category of “self-employed.”

The full survey is available on the AHA website.