With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

I Don't Feel I Need to Apologize

Among the predictions about the war that didn't pan out, there is one that hasn't been subjected to post-war ridicule, but that very much deserves it. This is the December letter, signed by over 1,000 academics, predicting and warning against Israel's possible "ethnic cleansing" of Palestinians in the "fog of war." The letter ended with this recommendation: "We urge our government to communicate clearly to the government of Israel that the expulsion of people according to race, religion or nationality would constitute crimes against humanity and will not be tolerated."

These people have (once again) brought shame on their discipline.... And they are now collectively in the moral position of owing apologies to the Israeli people and the Israeli government--of Ariel Sharon.-- Martin Kramer, April 25, 2003

Because I have now received several letters in response to HNN's publication of Martin Kramer's April 25 article, I would like to take this opportunity to provide some additional information that will help readers better understand the issues it raised.

Let me begin with the title: "The Petition Middle East Scholars Wish They Could Forget." I will admit to not having surveyed the entire list of more than 1000 petition signers - my guess is that neither has Mr. Kramer - but speaking for myself, and those whom I do know personally, no one has expressed regret or embarrassment over having signed this petition. Hence, the title itself is inaccurate, reflecting Mr. Kramer's wishes, certainly not mine nor, if I may venture to guess, those of my colleagues. [Note: The editor of HNN was responsible for the title, not Mr. Kramer.]

Second, the author failed to mention several key elements which help both explain our position and undermine his "argument." As he knows, but omitted in his presentation, the petition was drafted in response to a similar statement from more than 200 Israeli colleagues, expressing their concern that their government might attempt a "transfer" -- the euphemism for expulsion - of Palestinians, should there be a war. Given the public statements that have been made by various political figures in or close to the Sharon government regarding "transfer," such a statement from our Israeli colleagues was something that we took seriously, and hence to which we decided to respond by signing the petition.

Just as important, as Mr. Kramer also knows, the petition we signed did not predict transfer. It warned that it might occur. Those who are students or practitioners of politics know well that making people aware of the possibility of a problem may in some cases prevent its developing. Moreover, contrary to what Mr. Kramer's article suggests, there were consultations between the US government and the Israeli government, as well as the Jordanian and Lebanese governments in the lead up to the war against Iraq regarding the need to keep their respective borders quiet; that included, although it was not limited to, ruling out any possibility of expelling Palestinians. We are all thankful that "transfer" did not occur, but we are certainly not embarrassed for having been aware of and having spoken out about the possibility.

Third, Mr. Kramer singles out the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), because I am president-elect, as in particular need of forwarding an apology regarding the petition. His confusion here is a bit difficult to understand. I signed the petition as a scholar of the Middle East -- my university affiliation was for identification purposes only, as is usually the case in such matters. I did not include my MESA affiliation; indeed, I do not believe my election had even been announced at the time that I signed the petition. For those who are not familiar with MESA, it is an academic, not a political, organization. It encompasses students and scholars, as well as professionals outside the academy, of diverse backgrounds, disciplinary interests, and methodological and political tendencies. MESA had no role in the petition.

For those who would like more information on the petition, I would direct them to: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=261886

Finally, as for who is the "propagandist," the term Mr. Kramer used, I leave tone of his April article to speak for itself.