Originalism is Doomed to Failure. Will it Destroy Democracy First?
by Richard Striner
Textualism as a theory of judicial interpretation arose as a semantic game among academics, but has been put to brutal use by the Federalist Society to undermine the democracy that most 21st century Americans enjoy.
SOURCE: Above the Law
Judge Laurence Silberman Dies—Do His Latter Years Make the Case for Judicial Reform?
A legal observer suggests the influential judge's reputation might have benefitted from judicial term limits, as his penchant for judicial restraint took a hard turn toward activism in decisions on gun control and public pronouncements about confederate monuments.
SOURCE: The Atlantic
The Amendment Process is the Constitution's Biggest Flaw
by Jedediah Britton-Purdy
We are not the "we, the people" of 1789. Changing Article V to make the Constitution more easily amendable is the key to breaking the shackles the document places on democracy.
SOURCE: Mississippi Free Press
Historic Echoes as Mississippi Senators Vote No on Jackson Nomination
Did some statements made by Republicans echo Senator James Eastland's questioning whether Thurgood Marshall was "prejudiced against the white people of the South"?
SOURCE: Letters from an American
KBJ Confirmation Questions Show Republicans Willing to Throw Out Vast Swaths of Civil Rights Law
by Heather Cox Richardson
"Madison was on to something when he warned that there was a connection between establishing a religion and destroying American democracy."
12 Questions that Would Actually Help Us Learn Something about Ketanji Brown Jackson
Legal historians, law professors, and other scholars propose productive questions Senators could ask Biden's Supreme Court nominee, if they cared to stop grandstanding and speechifying.
SOURCE: 19th News
Ketanji Brown Jackson's Confirmation Hearings Highlight the Historic Domination of the Judiciary by White Men
"Representation has tangible benefits — research has shown the benefits of increasing judicial race and gender diversity, including heightening trust within minority populations and addressing gender bias in courtrooms."
How the Left Lost the Constitution
by Benjamin Morse
Law professors Joseph Fiskin and William Forbath revisit the Reconstruction Amendments to argue that they represent a fusion of a "democracy-of-opportunity" tradition in the law that embraces an affirmative government duty to redistribute wealth.
That Stench is Coming from the Supreme Court
by James D. Zirin
The Supreme Court's oral arguments in the Mississippi abortion case seem to show a conservative bloc wholly unconcerned with precedent, principle, or the legitimacy of the judiciary as they rush ahead to end abortion rights.
SOURCE: New York Times
Jefferson Expected the Constitution to Last 19 Years. Where are We Now?
by Jesse Wegman
Our eighteenth-century Constitution combines with twenty-first century partisanship to block meaningful reforms and place basic rights in the hands of the judiciary. A panel of legal scholars weighs in on the possibility of change.
SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
We Need a Second Season of ‘Mrs. America.’ Here’s Why
by Magdalene Zier
After the defeat of the ERA, Phyllis Schlafly's activist career entered a second act, pushing the federal judiciary in conservative directions.
SOURCE: Chronicle of Higher Education
Originalism’s Original Sin
by Adam Shapiro
Liberal critics should understand the ways that Constitutional originalism's practices of reading and resolving conflicts in the text owes a great deal to biblical literalism. Historians of religion can help understand what's at stake.
The Politicization of the American Judiciary
by James D. Zirin
Judicial elections are the latest target of GOP gerrymandering, spurred by the rejection of Team Trump's election lawsuits.
SOURCE: USA Today
Biden Can Advance Racial Justice, but Only if Democratic Senators Ditch an Old Tradition
The Senate's "blue slip" rule allows senators to privately exercise a veto over judicial nominations for their state. Like the filibuster, it has been used to derail the nominations of liberal judges as well as women and judges of color. A liberal judicial advocate argues that it should be scrapped.
SOURCE: Washington Post
Lifetime Tenure Meant Even Trump’s Supreme Court Picks Could Resist His Pressure
by Teri Kanefield
Alexander Hamilton's arguments for a independent judiciary in the Federalist Papers were borne out by the Supreme Court's dismissal of the pro-Trump suit brought by Texas's attorney general.
SOURCE: Boston Review
Our Undemocratic Constitution
by Julie C. Suk
"We should not misconstrue the success of the midcentury Court: the few bright moments of inclusive constitutionalism, from Brown to Roe, did not make our Constitution inclusive and democratic."
SOURCE: Made by History at The Washington Post
Amy Coney Barrett’s Philosophy Has Far Worse Roots Than Most Americans Know
by Simon Gilhooley
At the core of originalism is a fundamentally conservative effort to limit the possibilities of our constitutional order to the imagination of historical figures from the 18th century, which included racial hierarchy and support for chattel slavery.
SOURCE: New York Magazine
Burn it All Down: A Growing Number of Liberal Laywers Want More than Court Packing
Liberals in the legal profession and legal academia have begun to grapple with the idea that the courts serve power as much as justice, and norms of collegiality are part of the problem. Are they prepared to embrace a more confrontational and openly political idea of the law?
SOURCE: New York Review of Books
The Gonzo Constitutionalism of the American Right
by Corey Robin
"Conservatism has ceased to be a political project capable of creating hegemony through majoritarian means."
SOURCE: The New Republic
How the Republican Party Took Over the Supreme Court
by John Fabian Witt
We are now at least one decade into a nearly unprecedented experiment in partisan judging at the highest court in the land. Our legal and political systems have barely begun to process what that means.
- House Hearings on Campus Speech Show Different Perceptions of the Problem
- Mark Russell, DC's Piano-Playing Political Satirist, Dies at 90
- Trans Texans, Fearing Violence Inspired by Legislation and Rhetoric, Look to Armed Self-Defense
- How Paris Kicked out the Cars
- Vatican Repudiates "Doctrine of Discovery" that Justified Colonialism by Catholic Nations