Now That's Just Mean
Were they really worried that [Maggie] Gallagher would come out for free love without the cash incentive? Neither she nor [Armstrong] Williams is really known for their independent streak. In Gallagher's case -- and to some degree in Williams' too -- this seems less like a matter of payola than a Bush administration make-work program for third-tier GOP pundits.Williams is not alone. My favorite passage:
Gallagher failed to mention that she had a $21,500 contract with the Department of Health and Human Services to help promote the president's proposal [i.e., his $300 million"marriage initiative"]. ...Forgetful Maggie. Not a quality that's terribly helpful to a journalist.
"Did I violate journalistic ethics by not disclosing it?" Gallagher said yesterday."I don't know. You tell me." She said she would have"been happy to tell anyone who called me" about the contract but that"frankly, it never occurred to me" to disclose it.
Later in the day, Gallagher filed a column in which she said that"I should have disclosed a government contract when I later wrote about the Bush marriage initiative. I would have, if I had remembered it. My apologies to my readers."
Or to a"journalist." Hmm...with or without the quotes? I don't know. You tell me.
comments powered by Disqus
- Coming Soon, a Century Late: A Black Film Gem
- The discovery that complicated the history of sex change operations
- NYT identifies the person who exposed Gary Hart's philandering
- Decades After Trinity Nuclear Test in New Mexico, U.S. Studies Cancer Fallout
- Lawrence Of Arabia's Hand-Drawn, WWI Map Is Up for Auction
- Ken Burns is in a race to slow us down
- Ken Burns and the Myth of Theodore Roosevelt
- What Ken Burns Doesn't Understand about the Roosevelts
- A call for historians to do macro history