Now That's Just Mean
Were they really worried that [Maggie] Gallagher would come out for free love without the cash incentive? Neither she nor [Armstrong] Williams is really known for their independent streak. In Gallagher's case -- and to some degree in Williams' too -- this seems less like a matter of payola than a Bush administration make-work program for third-tier GOP pundits.Williams is not alone. My favorite passage:
Gallagher failed to mention that she had a $21,500 contract with the Department of Health and Human Services to help promote the president's proposal [i.e., his $300 million"marriage initiative"]. ...Forgetful Maggie. Not a quality that's terribly helpful to a journalist.
"Did I violate journalistic ethics by not disclosing it?" Gallagher said yesterday."I don't know. You tell me." She said she would have"been happy to tell anyone who called me" about the contract but that"frankly, it never occurred to me" to disclose it.
Later in the day, Gallagher filed a column in which she said that"I should have disclosed a government contract when I later wrote about the Bush marriage initiative. I would have, if I had remembered it. My apologies to my readers."
Or to a"journalist." Hmm...with or without the quotes? I don't know. You tell me.
comments powered by Disqus
- The six-day war: why Israel is still divided over its legacy 50 years on
- "Space archaeology" transforms how ancient sites are discovered
- A military cemetery whose African American history is hidden in plain sight in Philadelphia
- Texas Senate increases education board's textbook veto power
- The Secret Transcripts of the Six-Day War
- AHA joins protest of Trump’s plan for drastic cuts to the NEH
- Diane Ravitch says the Democrats paved the way for the education secretary's efforts to privatize our public schools
- Mark Moyar explains why he came to believe the Vietnam War was winnable
- How should Texas high schoolers learn history?
- What's the 'greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history’?