The Bush that Cried Wolf
That doesn't mean the system shouldn't be abolished. But that was true the moment after FDR signed the bill 70 years ago. I have to agree with George Will (oh, horror!),"[T]he philosophic reasons for reforming Social Security are more compelling than the fiscal reasons."
Update: Cato is also deemphasizing the alleged financial crisis in favor of the property-rights case. See this article.
comments powered by Disqus
M.D. Fulwiler - 1/20/2005
I hate the program as much as anyone, but the program is running a surplus until 2018. After that, they can "fix" it by a combination of tax increases and benefit cuts and by raiding general revenues. Unless the public turns against the system (we can hope!), they can almost certainly continue paying people ~something~ for 70 more years.
- Historian James Harris says Russian archives show we’ve misunderstood Stalin
- The Invisible Labor of Women’s Studies
- Lincoln University historian mourns decision to abolish the history major
- Hamilton College conservative historian questions diversity requirement
- Historians on Donald Trump: A Huge Hit on Facebook