The insurgents of Iraq? No. This is the way David Hackett Fischer describes the American Patriots in December of 1776 on the eve of Washington's great triumph at Trenton in the new book, Washington's Crossing, which I heartily recommend.
Of course I don't mean to suggest parallels between the insurgents of Iraq and the rebels of 1776. Our rebels never chopped off anybody's head or blew up innocent people.
But reading Fischer's book over the holidays gave me a strange feeling. Is it possible that their insurgents see themselves as patriots just as ours did?
One of the reasons I love history is because it gives one a chance to get outside oneself and one's own delimiting experience.
Reading Fischer I couldn't help but wonder if someday if the Iraqi insurgents win one of their historians will come along and turn their nightmare activities into a book about heroism and sacrifice?
In my book there is nothing heroic about the Iraqi insurgents. They are fighting a battle they deserve to lose. The way they are waging their struggle is appalling.
But what mighty pools of passion can they draw from! Our insurgents had just nationalism going for them. The Iraqis have both nationalism and fanatical religiosity. Nationalism alone can fire people's imagination and induce them to make enormous sacrifices in the service of causes both uplifting and despicable. Add in the fanaticism of the believer's religious zeal and you have one powerful, demonic cocktail.
This is what we are dealing with in Iraq.
The British couldn't defeat American Patriots and the Patriots had only nationalism going for them. Imagine if they felt God had directed them to rebel? (Patriots to be sure did feel that God was on their side, but they weren't fighting for God. They were fighting for the God-given rights of man, which is far different.)
Am I right to describe the Sunni fanatics as nationalists? They are in favor of the nation only if they get to control it, as they did under Saddam. But I still think it fair to describe them as nationalists.
comments powered by Disqus
Nathan M Williams - 1/6/2005
That Iraqi insurgents have less to fall back on if they cease fighting. I am hardly an expert on the period, but I imagine the majority of American rebels had farms or jobs to go back to if they deserted or lost. Yes, their pride would be hurt and the universal rights of man curtailed and all that, but they were hardly fueled by desperation. For many of these young, Sunni men, I imagine the future seems very bleak.
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Transcribed Document: Soviet Politburo Discussed CIA Billion Dollar Spy Adolf Tolkachev
- Pentagon withholds Iraq War photos showing detainee abuse
- These Rebels Have Amassed A Library From Syria’s Ruins
- Was 1916 fire at Canadian Parliament set by German saboteur?
- United Nations Calls On U.S. To Pay African Americans Reparations For Slavery
- Juan Cole says America’s inclination to turn to the military started with Manifest Destiny
- History Jobs Drop
- Paul Krugman gives credence to Robert J. Gordon's pessimism about American economic growth
- Harvard President Drew Faust Condemns Free Tuition Proposal from Outsider Overseers Ticket
- Andrew Roberts says Trump is the Mussolini of America with double the vulgarity