End of This Phase of American History?
comments powered by Disqus
Roderick T. Long - 4/24/2009
started in 1776 as far as I can tell.
Lester Hunt - 4/23/2009
Another possibility for the next phase that is at least as realistic as the two that DeLong considers is: the breakup of of the former USA into several independent or loosely confederated republics.
William Marina - 4/23/2009
I find DeLong's efforts to talk of continued Republic phases utterly confusing. If, in the New Deal, so-called phase of our Republic, the Federal Gov't by his own description already had "unbridled" power, how could it be said the US was really still a Republic by any meaningful definition of that term? Little Jamie Madison, with his notion of "Feudal" Republics, must be rolling over in his grave.
John Adams in 1775 phrased it very nicely, that a Republic had a rule of Law, an Empire was rule by despotic men without any sense of Law. That is a pretty apt description of America today.
To call this a "Third Republic" is nonsense! It is, perhaps, the Fourth stage or phase of Empire, to be a bit more accurate.
With great structured pretense, he has given us verbal garbage, or at the very best, garbled verbiage!
- In France, Vestiges of the Great War’s Bloody End
- New Evidence Supporting Volcanoes as Cause for Mass Extinction and Rapid Climate Change
- Film Conjures Era That Some in Selma Would Rather Not Revisit
- White? Black? A Murky Distinction Grows Still Murkier
- The best history books of 2014 – as rated by historians
- Martin Kramer says Israelis have "no clue” that Ari Shavit “has added a massacre in the city of Lydda to the litany of Israel’s alleged crimes in 1948"
- Carleton Mabee, Biographer of Morse, Dies at 99
- NYT editorial cites work of Harvard's Sven Beckert and Cornell’s Edward Baptist
- Majors in history earn more than others in the humanities
- The director of Mount Vernon’s library says it’s difficult to pierce the Washington myth (Interview)