Noted Here and There ...
One plausible explanation for Martin Luther King's"I Have a Dream" speech at the March on Washington is that he was delivering a fairly uninspired text built on the metaphor of a"bad check," until Mahalia Jackson called out from behind him:"Tell ‘em about the dream, Martin!" With that, King abandoned his text and launched into a version of a well rehearsed oration Jackson had heard him give weeks earlier in Detroit. I thought about that again as the blogosphere mulled over George Bush's truly bizarre pledge last week not to appoint anyone to the Supreme Court who would approve of the Dred Scott decision. As you may know, one plausible explanation for it is that of Paperwight's Fair Shot. In pro-life circles, the argument goes, Dred Scott is so commonly identified with Roe v. Wade that George Bush's handlers knew that he could cite Dred Scott and it would be understood by the base as a figurative reference to Roe, without antagonizing pro-choice voters. Put that together with speculation that Bush was wired for radio communications from his handlers (scroll down; see also: Wendy McElroy's post at Liberty & Power) and you get Karl Rove as Mahalia Jackson calling out:"Tell ‘em about Dred Scott, George!"
My colleague, Jonathan Dresner, has a fine essay,"Revising Hawaiian History for an Unambiguous Age", over on the HNN mainpage.
The new Common-place is up. Of particular interest are Suzanne Lebsock's meditation on history and fiction, Anne G. Miles,"Slaves in Algiers, Captives in Iraq", and Matt Childs's review of Randy Sparks's new book, The Two Princes of Calabar: An Eighteenth Century Atlantic Odyssey.
At Gnostical Turpitude, Ed Conn cites a number of goodies, including a profile of historian and conservative activist Michael Ledeen in the Boston Globe, Richard Posner's review of The Annotated Sherlock Holmes for TNR, Joshua Glenn's rather mean speculation in the Globe about why Posner was so critical of Holmes's deduction, Lynn Barber's profile of historian David Starkey as"the meanest man in Britain," Scott McLemee's review of a psychiatrist's interviews with Nazis at the end of World War II, and Catherine Kodat's review of new books on the cultural Cold War for the Boston Review.
comments powered by Disqus
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- One of the last remaining Nazis goes on trial in Germany
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges