Jonathan Dresner: Bush's Noth Korean Policy Is a Muddle
Richard V. Allen's attempt (9/15) to defend Bush's North Korea policy as "exactly what is necessary" falls far short. It's ludicrous to call a policy which has consisted of a few largely ceremonial meetings a "steady, multilateral approach." I believe that the Bush administration is correct to involve North Korea's neighbor states in the discussions, but if a Democrat proposed proceeding at this pace, Republicans would call it a dangerous abandonment of our responsibilities to prevent nuclear proliferation and preserve political stability in an economically and politically vital region.
Contrasted with our policy towards Iraq and statements on Iran, our passivity towards North Korea validates North Korean Premier Kim Jong Il's sense of self-importance, and strengthens the argument that our Middle East policy has more to do with oil than with weaponry.
Jonathan Dresner, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of East Asian History University of Hawai'i at Hilo
comments powered by Disqus
- NYT hosts debate including Eric Foner: How Americans should remember Reconstruction
- William Leuchtenburg says historians and the media have been too hard on Obama
- Hugh Ambrose, historian who helped develop WWII Museum, dead at 48
- Historian discounts claim that Churchill and other British PM's were gay
- Nick Bunker Wins $50,000 2015 George Washington Book Prize