comments powered by Disqus
Ralph E. Luker - 9/15/2004
I have the impression that all the talk about Viet Nam _really_ is, in many ways, talk about Iraq. Perhaps we have to confront the present through an historical lens precisely because the present is too painful to confront directly.
Charles Johnson - 9/15/2004
Well, this is only half the story. After all, while John Kerry did volunteer to fight in Vietnam, he later opposed the war, and played a major role in organizing against it; whereas while George W. Bush had strings pulled to keep him far away from the fightin', he strongly supported the war.
David T. Beito - 9/14/2004
There is another example, sort of. In 1940, the pro-war FDR had failed to volunteer in WWI despite the stern advice of his cousin Teddy. His opponent Wendell Wilkie (who took a slightly skeptical view of the WWII) had enlisted in 1916.
- Coming Soon, a Century Late: A Black Film Gem
- The discovery that complicated the history of sex change operations
- NYT identifies the person who exposed Gary Hart's philandering
- Decades After Trinity Nuclear Test in New Mexico, U.S. Studies Cancer Fallout
- Lawrence Of Arabia's Hand-Drawn, WWI Map Is Up for Auction
- Ken Burns is in a race to slow us down
- Ken Burns and the Myth of Theodore Roosevelt
- What Ken Burns Doesn't Understand about the Roosevelts
- A call for historians to do macro history