How to Question a Politician
A better approach would have been to observe that the president in stating his opposition to the 527 ads was saying he opposed ads by all groups not controlled by the campaign or the party.
Media Person: Correct?
Bush Spokesman: Yes, that's correct.
Media Person: Does he object to the message in the Swift Boat ad?
Bush Spokesman: He objects to all the ads.
Media Person: I repeat. Does he object to the message in the Swift Boat ad?
What needed to be done was for the media, in other words, to acknowledge that there are legitimately 2 questions here: 1. the wisdom of allowing 527 groups to run ads, and 2. the particular message of the anti-Kerry ad.
Presumably, the Bush people would refuse to answer the second question. In that case, the public will have a clear appreciation of this fact. But by not distinguishing between the two questions the media have allowed the Bush people to muddy the waters with an explanation that is decidedly off-point.
The media might also have noted in the course of these interviews that Republicans argued in Congress that 527 groups should have every right to advertise their views. It was Democrats who insisted on restrictions on the 527s. (The 527s cannot mention specific candidates in the month leading up to the election.) Republicans say they favor freedom and disclosure, as Virginia Sen. George Allen said on Meet the Press. If that is so, how can the president under the circumstances demand that all 527s stop advertising?
comments powered by Disqus
Derek Charles Catsam - 8/30/2004
the president can feign an objection here because he knows that it will not and cannot happen. this is why I loved the solution posed by one of the New republic's bloggers the other day: Kerry should propose to Bush that he too would support the suspension of all 527 ads in exchange for weekly debates, the logic being that the role of ads is to get ideas across to the public, but that they largely fail in that, but that debates would let candidates bring their messages home to people. Bush would then be in a position to have to object, which would likely not look great. And like Bush in this instance, of course Kerry has no more power to suspend these ads than does Bush. It's all a big gambit anyway.
- Trump Holds Wide Lead in South Carolina
- An All-or-Nothing Fight for the Supreme Court
- Did Trump Really Lose the Debate?
- Scalia’s Death Sets Off Epic Battle
- Democrats See Gift in GOP Blocking Court Nominee
- Quote of the Day
- The Nastiest GOP Debate
- Reaction to the Republican Debate
- The GOP Presidential Debate
- How Clinton Could Respond on Supreme Court Vacancy
- Trump and Clinton Way Ahead in South Carolina
- McConnell Says Senate Will Wait to Replace Scalia
- Antonin Scalia Is Dead
- Clinton Says Sanders Would Be Threat to Obama Legacy
- Internal Tracker Shows Trump Leading in South Carolina
- Ben Carson used an apparently fake Joseph Stalin quote — and the Internet loved it
- Rubio exaggerates in saying it's been 80 years since a 'lame duck' made a Supreme Court nomination
- Humans Hard-Wired to Teach, Anthropologist Says
- Parents outraged after students shown ‘white guilt’ cartoon for Black History Month
- Maryland is once again considering retiring its state song
- Historian at the center of Sanders-Clinton debate
- James Loewen Says Additional Baltimore Confederate Statues Should be Removed
- NYT History Book Reviews: Who Got Noticed this Week?
- A historian’s advice to students thinking of getting a PhD in a tough economic climate
- German historian Heinz Richter cleared of charges