Setting aside the question of who, exactly,"says men don't vote for a woman," Rankin was elected in 1916. Montana women received the right to vote in 1914. And, even though Clinton has tried to redefine herself as an early opponent of the Iraq war, is it really good politics to link herself to the only member of Congress to oppose going to war against Germany and Japan in World War II?
comments powered by Disqus
Paul Noonan - 4/7/2008
Rankin did vote against the declaration of war against Japan on December 8, 1941. However, when the votes on the declarations against German and Italy came up for votes on December 11, she voted "present" rather than "no" both times. She obviously had something of a change of heart, or perhaps she was just being prudent. By "prudent" I don't mean she was trying to save her political career - she must have known that was finished - but perhaps she was afraid that further "no" votes might increase the chance she might have been subjected to physical violence.
Oscar Chamberlain - 4/7/2008
However self-serving, the point Wilentz makes is worth considering. The proportional system may be a better measure of what Democrats want than a winner-take-all system is, but is it a poorer measure of which Democrat may win?
Robert KC Johnson - 4/7/2008
The comments on the Wilentz piece were hilarious: "If you squint and read everything backwards and divide by two, then you see she's really WINNING the nomination."
Robert KC Johnson - 4/7/2008
Jeremy Young - 4/7/2008
I beat you by six minutes.
Kevin C. Murphy - 4/6/2008
Alan Allport - 4/6/2008
... many, many members of Congress made clear their opposition to going to war against Germany throughout 1941. The issue was taken out of their hands when Hitler declared war himself on December 11, conveniently allowing them to reinvent themselves as staunch anti-Nazis. Rankin at least had the virtue of consistency.
- Rubio Surges Into Second In New Hampshire
- Branstad Says Cruz Ran ‘Unethical’ Campaign
- Christie Highlights Santorum’s Endorsement of Rubio
- Portman Comes Out Against Trade Deal
- Megyn Kelly Gets a Book Deal
- A Big List of the Bad Things Clinton Has Done
- An Unambiguous Sign Sanders Won Last Night’s Debate
- Still Friends at the End
- Quote of the Day
- Trump Still Leads as Clinton Slips
- Clinton Can’t Shake Image as Wall Street’s Friend
- Maddow Doesn’t See Sanders Winning
- Why Does the Media Still Shield Chelsea Clinton?
- Bush Jokes His Mother May Have Abused Him
- Rubio Closes the Gap in New Hampshire
- Mary Beard, herself a bestselling author, wonders why more women historians aren't
- Princeton U. historian Imani Perry claims mistreatment in parking ticket arrest
- Retired historian George Dennison remains on the payroll at the U. of Montana while faculty are cut
- The Atlantic profiles exciting ways to teach history
- LDS Church has gone from 0 to 4 historians specializing in women’s history