The Man Who Invented the Modern Shopping Mall 50 Years Ago
Malcolm Gladwell, commenting on a new biography, Mall Maker by M. Jeffrey Hartwick, which tells the story of the man who invented the modern shopping mall; in the New Yorker (March 15, 2004):
[Victor] Gruen's most famous creation was his next project, in the town of Edina , just outside Minneapolis . He began work on it almost exactly fifty years ago. It was called Southdale. It cost twenty million dollars, and had seventy-two stores and two anchor department-store tenants, Donaldson's and Dayton 's. Until then, most shopping centers had been what architects like to call "extroverted," meaning that store windows and entrances faced both the parking area and the interior pedestrian walkways. Southdale was introverted: the exterior walls were blank, and all the activity was focussed on the inside. Suburban shopping centers had always been in the open, with stores connected by outdoor passageways. Gruen had the idea of putting the whole complex under one roof, with air-conditioning for the summer and heat for the winter. Almost every other major shopping center had been built on a single level, which made for punishingly long walks. Gruen put stores on two levels, connected by escalators and fed by two-tiered parking. In the middle he put a kind of town square, a "garden court" under a skylight, with a fishpond, enormous sculpted trees, a twenty-one-foot cage filled with bright-colored birds, balconies with hanging plants, and a cafe. The result, Hardwick writes, was a sensation:
Journalists from all of the country's top magazines came for the Minneapolis shopping center's opening. Life, Fortune, Time, Women ' s Wear Daily, the New York Times, Business Week and Newsweek all covered the event. The national and local press wore out superlatives attempting to capture the feeling of Southdale. "The Splashiest Center in the U. S. ," Life sang. The glossy weekly praised the incongruous combination of a "goldfish pond, birds, art and 10 acres of stores all . . . under one Minnesota roof." A "pleasure-dome-with-parking," Time cheered. One journalist announced that overnight Southdale had become an integral "part of the American Way ." ....
Under tax law, if you build an office building, or buy a piece of machinery for your factory, or make any capital purchase for your business, that investment is assumed to deteriorate and lose some part of its value from wear and tear every year. As a result, a business is allowed to set aside some of its income, tax-free, to pay for the eventual cost of replacing capital investments. For tax purposes, in the early fifties the useful life of a building was held to be forty years, so a developer could deduct one-fortieth of the value of his building from his income every year. A new forty-million-dollar mall, then, had an annual depreciation deduction of a million dollars. What Congress did in 1954, in an attempt to stimulate investment in manufacturing, was to"accelerate" the depreciation process for new construction. Now, using this and other tax loopholes, a mall developer could recoup the cost of his investment in a fraction of the time. As the historian Thomas Hanchett argues, in a groundbreaking paper in The American Historical Review, the result was a"bonanza" for developers. In the first few years after a shopping center was built, the depreciation deductions were so large that the mall was almost certainly losing money, at least on paper-which brought with it enormous tax benefits. For instance, in a front-page article in 1961 on the effect of the depreciation changes, the Wall Street Journal described the finances of a real-estate investment company called Kratter Corp. Kratter's revenue from its real-estate operations in 1960 was $9,997,043. Deductions from operating expenses and mortgage interest came to $4,836,671, which left a healthy income of $5.16 million. Then came depreciation, which came to $6.9 million, so now Kratter's healthy profit had been magically turned into a"loss" of $1.76 million. Imagine that you were one of five investors in Kratter. The company's policy was to distribute nearly all of its pre-depreciation revenue to its investors, so your share of their earnings would be roughly a million dollars. Ordinarily, you'd pay a good chunk of that in taxes. But that million dollars wasn't income. After depreciation, Kratter didn't make any money. That million dollars was"return on capital," and it was tax-free.
comments powered by Disqus
M Gilmore - 5/26/2004
Someone else to consider is James Rouse. There's a new book out: Better Places, Better Lives: A Biography of James Rouse by Joshua Olsen
published by ULI in 2004.
Olsen is speak in Washington DC June 1.
Olsson’s Book Store – Lansburgh/Penn Quarter
418 7th St, NW
June 1st, 2004 7pm
The career of James Rouse, real estate developer and master planner, is the
story of the complexities and contradictions of why and how America was built
the way it was during the last half century. From affordable mortgages in
the suburbs to inner-city urban renewal, from the suburban shopping mall to
the downtown festival marketplace, and from a massive planned community for
100,000 people to individual homes for the poor, Rouse was there, leading the
Olsen’s biography touches upon these complexities and contradictions in
Rouse’s life— from his boyhood in a rural Maryland town to his golden years
in Columbia—the city he created from scratch. This is the first book to
detail this trend-setting developer’s inspiration and to explore the
ramifications, both good and bad, of his innovative projects, building what
he believed to be a better America.
Rouse’s main connection to Washington DC is urban renewal—he authored with
Nathaniel Keith “No slums in ten years” (known as the Keith-Rouse report) in
1955…an influential work on renewal in Washington—particularly Southwest. It
served as the basis for the “workable program” of urban renewal followed for
many more years. He also helped found what is now Jubilee Housing—a DC
nonprofit housing developer.
Olsen will speak on Rouse and his career, answer questions, and sign books.
There are not a lot of seats, so you may want to call in advance.
- Historian James Harris says Russian archives show we’ve misunderstood Stalin
- The Invisible Labor of Women’s Studies
- Lincoln University historian mourns decision to abolish the history major
- Hamilton College conservative historian questions diversity requirement
- Historians on Donald Trump: A Huge Hit on Facebook