DEMOCRATS TO BETRAY ISRAEL?
Perhaps the most notable similarity with the Bush administration is on Israel. As recently as 1999 and 2000, it was acceptable for Bill Clinton, a Democratic president, to talk about “Israel’s occupation of the West Bank” as an obstacle to peace. Mr Clinton frequently referred to Israeli settlements in the occupied territories in the same vein. That is no longer mainstream.
The section in Mrs Clinton’s website dealing with foreign policy summarizes her record on defending Israel and says she has “spoken out against the problem of anti-Semitism in Palestinian textbooks”. Nowhere does it mention her support for a renewed peace process.
In an article in Foreign Affairs published on Friday, Mr Obama calls for a renewed focus on an Israeli-Palestinian peace process. He adds that “our starting point must always be a clear and strong commitment to the security of Israel”. Mr Obama was criticized after the first debate for having forgotten Israel when asked to list the US’s key allies.
“The plain fact is there is no upside for candidates to challenge the prevailing assumptions about Israel,” said one of their advisers, who asked not to be named. “The best strategy is to win the White House and then change the debate.”
My guess their advisor is Ivo Daalder who is quoted elsewhere in the article and not a friend of Israel.
comments powered by Disqus
- How Will Obama Be Graded By History?
- The controversy behind the painting that will hang at Trump’s inaugural luncheon
- A nation of dissent: The most famous inaugural protests in U.S. history
- German Vice Chancellor Condemns Populist's Holocaust Remarks
- Arizona scuttles bill that took aim at whiteness studies
- Obama’s Legacy as a Historian
- Jack Rakove tells League of Women Voters Electoral College needs to be abolished
- Juan Cole says Chelsea Manning’s leaks contributed to the revolution in Tunisia
- Bacevich and Mearsheimer on Obama’s Legacy
- Where Historians Work: An Interactive Database of History PhD Career Outcomes